I've been running my review collections on OpenExchange now for more than 3 years.
I explained the principle I apply in a past article.
These reviews are the first step of the quality check in OEX.
My personal Credo
My expectation of OEX (expressed in extreme) is to see it rather as
a collection of jewels, than just a flea market.
I start this discussion encouraged by @Evgeny Shvarov in his recent comment
The quality of Open Exchange is very important, of course! And we have a set of features and processes are intended to understand and improve the average quality of projects. And as OEX is a living mechanism it is not possible to "click" and improve the quality forever. I appreciate your willingness to improve the quality and PRs submission. Please suggest what do you think could be introduced more to improve the quality. We'll try to make PRs more visible in Open Exchange. And also the ideas on how to improve the quality of the submissions are very welcome!
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
%20(3).jpg)
