Does anyone know what this task does exactly? And what problems would I have if I didn't use an SSL certificate?
I got the error: "SSL/TLS error in SSL_connect(), SSL_ERROR_SSL: protocol error, error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed"
https://www.youtube.com/embed/iw8w2BE61xY [This is an embedded link, but you cannot view embedded content directly on the site because you have declined the cookies necessary to access it. To view embedded content, you would need to accept all cookies in your Cookies Settings]
I restore the “dirty” copy of the IRIS.DAT files, then apply the incremental backup as documented for Online Backup. As shown in the picture, restarting the service before mounting and rejoining the database to the mirror can restore the mirror database to the point in time of dirty data. I think the mount method used here is the default value, and I don't want it to perform mirrorcatchup. Is there any other way to recover the mirrored database to the point in time of dirty data?
A new exciting challenge introduced for Global Masters members of "Advocate" level and above: we invite you to record a 30-60 sec video with an answer to our question:
➥ What is the value of InterSystems IRIS to you?
🎁 Reward of your choice for doing the interview: $50 Gift Card (VISA/Amazon) or 12,000 points!
Follow this direct link to the challenge for more information. Please note that the link will work for GM members of "Advocate" level and above. More about GM levels you can read here.
MonLBL is a tool for analyzing the performance of ObjectScript code execution line by line. codemonitor.MonLBL is a wrapper based on the %Monitor.System.LineByLine package from InterSystems IRIS, designed to collect precise metrics on the execution of routines, classes, or CSP pages.
The wrapper and all examples presented in this article are available in the following GitHub repository: iris-monlbl-example
In my DB, it has more than 10,000 files. I tried to search for a particular file (mac), but there is no search option to find it. Can you help me find that option to search for a file?
I'm running a query, joining nine tables together. When I run it with a SELECT COUNT(*) I get about 200,000 rows. When I run the SELECT with the columns I want, I get about 2,700 rows. Is there something inherent with the queries that limits the result set size, or anything I can do to make sure I'm getting back all the results? Rather, than trying to run it about 100 times limiting all previously gotten accounts.
As the title suggests, I would like to programmatically export each individual data lookup table as XML, either as a stream object or to a file. How would I go about doing this?
I was looking for an easier way to build the FHIR Query String, given the Record Map request that is passed into the DTL.
I built this Function, but when I run a message through it, my Query String that is passed back into the DTL is a Reference Pointer and not the String I am looking for.
Let's meet at the online meetup with the winners of the Python Contest. It's a great opportunity to chat with the InterSystems Experts team and our contestants.
Winners' demo included!
Date & Time: Thursday, August 8, 12 pm EDT | 6 pm CEST
https://www.youtube.com/embed/lT6WGCbTMCc?si=YzF5eDpFWN5qjgpe [This is an embedded link, but you cannot view embedded content directly on the site because you have declined the cookies necessary to access it. To view embedded content, you would need to accept all cookies in your Cookies Settings]
Some of our integrations use a system DSN to interact with our Data Warehouse (built on Microsoft SQL Server). We've recently migrated from SQL Server 2016 to 2022 and on the day of go-live we changed DNS cname records as a mechanism for redirecting everything to the new server. This worked great for users and reports, but for some reason we found that HealthShare clung onto the old server name even after several days.
If one of your packages on OEX receives a review you get notified by OEX only own YOUR package. The rating reflects the experience of the reviewer with the status found at the time of review. It is kind of a snapshot and might have changed meanwhile. Reviews by other members of the community are marked by * in the last column.
I also placed a bunch of Pull Requests on Github when I found a problem I could fix. Some were accepted and merged, and some were just ignored. So if you did a major change and expect a changed review just let me know.