Three more topics added:

  • August - Interoperability Adapters for InterSystems IRIS and InterSystems IRIS for Health
  • September - Multi-model solution using InterSystems IRIS
  • October - Interoperability Solution using InterSystems IRIS

The schedule is subject to change, stay tuned!

But these topics will appear! So ask your questions and be prepared!

Hi Developers!

And this is the last day fo Voting in InterSystems Online Contest before we know the names of the winners!

Please check out today's voting results:

Expert Nomination, Top 3

  1. ISC DEV - 8
  2. BlocksExplorer  - 7
  3. isc-utils - 7

➡️ The leaderboard.

Community Nomination, Top 3

  1. sql-builder - 10
  2. BlocksExplorer - 10
  3. isc-generate-db - 6

➡️ The leaderboard.

Make your choice!

Hi Gev!

Thanks for sharing! This is a good feature for Studio users, but VSCode ObjectScript has it out of the box.

I'm curious, could you please add the option to export all the IRIS Analytics (DeepSee) artifacts?

Currently, to export Pivots and Dashboards I use the call:

d ##class(dev.code).export("*.DFI")

then to export Termlists, Pivot variables and calculated measures I use:

d ##class(dev.code).exportDeepSeeArtefacts()

And to export Cube class call:

d ##class(dev.code).export("MyCube.CLS")

Is it possible to add a method that will export DFI, artifacts and cubes classes at once?

Maks, thank you for your words, I appreciate! And thanks for the participation in the contest - your entry and video are very bright! 

Speaking about ObjectScript - maybe one day we can set up a contest for "BetterScript" or collaborative project which will include all the "wishes" community introduced during the last 10 years.  And I hope it is possible assuming that fact ObjectScript first compiles into INT script and then into OBJ. 

Hi Rubens!

I'm glad that you are considering it! ZPM is a very powerful and helpful tool.

  • Is ZPM client compatible with Caché 2017.x versions?

it's not at the moment. But it's an open project, you can add this support if you want. And send the PR then.

  • Can we configure a self-hosted registry that doesn't require a GitHub repository link?

Yes you can. You can setup your own registry - here is how.

You can alter the registry in ZPM client, and create, pack, and publish and then install it from the alternative registry, e.g. your corporate registry.

  • Could the ZPM client zip and upload the whole package (all classes, routines, includes) instead of downloading it from a Github link?

YES. 

  • Can we declare a module that specifies classes themselves instead of their package counterpart? e.g. My.Class.CLS instead of My.PKG.

Sure. See the article and an Example.