Hi @Robert Cemper !

Thanks for the initiative! The quality of applications on OEX is one of the key focuses of Open Exchange team.

For both projects I'd invite first the authors to review your PR: @Peter Steiwer and @Zachary Krowiak - could you please take a look?

On the republishing copies of the projects on OEX - I'm not sure that the complete copy with improved readme and fixed dockerfile is a good idea. But the new project that introduces a new quality and new values added to an existing project is something that makes more sense to me. 

And here is the related video how to use the template:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/9sR6_f8uNHc
[This is an embedded link, but you cannot view embedded content directly on the site because you have declined the cookies necessary to access it. To view embedded content, you would need to accept all cookies in your Cookies Settings]

Hi Robert!

The quality of Open Exchange is very important, of course! And we have a set of features and processes are intended to understand and improve the average quality of projects. And as OEX is a living mechanism it is not possible to "click" and improve the quality forever.

I appreciate your willingness to improve the quality and PRs submission. Please suggest what do you think could be introduced more to improve the quality. 
We'll try to make PRs more visible in Open Exchange.

And also the ideas on how to improve the quality of the submissions are very welcome!