You might be running into some security issues (check the audit DB to confirm). Or, you might not have it working because you have "Lock CSP Name" set to "Yes" in one of the web applications (ref: http://docs.intersystems.com/cache20152/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GCSP_config#GCSP_lockcsp).
I just did a quick test as follows in my 2015.1 instance:
1) Created a SAMPLES2 namespace with new SAMPLES2 DB
2) Package mapped "csp" from SAMPLES namespace to SAMPLES2 namespace
3) Edited /csp/samples2 web application as follows:
- added Unauthenticated
- added %DB_SAMPLES Application Role
- Unchecked "Lock CSP Name" AND "Autocompile" (this should be done in both /csp/samples and /csp/samples2)
- pointed "CSP Files Physical Path" to c:\intersystems\e20151\csp\samples\
After this I was then able to see /csp/samples2/form.csp (although with errors because I didn't map the Samples.* package to the Samples Namespace).
So it appears to work - you just need to figure out which of the above pieces you missed :)
I asume since you used MyPage.csp in your example you are doing tag-based and not class-based CSP development?
Remember that tag-based .csp files compile into classes within the namespace (by default these are csp.* classes). So you could package-map csp.* (or whatever package you configure your CSP pages to compile into) from your Readonly namespace to the XYZ namespace, and then you could point the /csp/xyz application to the source directory holding the csp pages. I think this is likely to do what you want (although I haven't tested it).
It's a good point Evgeny, however I would still think that the benefit of letting people clarify their question or response outweighs the possibility of someone changing the content completely.
Also, once there is a proper up-vote and down-vote in place, people won't have to add "+1" comments anymore :)
Code.InterSystems.com was launched but then not advertised because of the Developer Community effort. It is still supported and will remain open and available until such time as all functionality is available on the Developer Community and all content has been moved to make it accessible here. Feel free to make use of that site until you see announcements about it being moved. It works with InterSystems SSO so you can use your existing account.
Great :)
Kenneth,
Check out /csp/samples/upload.csp
Does this cover what you need?
Benjamin,
You might be running into some security issues (check the audit DB to confirm). Or, you might not have it working because you have "Lock CSP Name" set to "Yes" in one of the web applications (ref: http://docs.intersystems.com/cache20152/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GCSP_config#GCSP_lockcsp).
I just did a quick test as follows in my 2015.1 instance:
1) Created a SAMPLES2 namespace with new SAMPLES2 DB
2) Package mapped "csp" from SAMPLES namespace to SAMPLES2 namespace
3) Edited /csp/samples2 web application as follows:
- added Unauthenticated
- added %DB_SAMPLES Application Role
- Unchecked "Lock CSP Name" AND "Autocompile" (this should be done in both /csp/samples and /csp/samples2)
- pointed "CSP Files Physical Path" to c:\intersystems\e20151\csp\samples\
After this I was then able to see /csp/samples2/form.csp (although with errors because I didn't map the Samples.* package to the Samples Namespace).
So it appears to work - you just need to figure out which of the above pieces you missed :)
HTH!
Ben
I asume since you used MyPage.csp in your example you are doing tag-based and not class-based CSP development?
Remember that tag-based .csp files compile into classes within the namespace (by default these are csp.* classes). So you could package-map csp.* (or whatever package you configure your CSP pages to compile into) from your Readonly namespace to the XYZ namespace, and then you could point the /csp/xyz application to the source directory holding the csp pages. I think this is likely to do what you want (although I haven't tested it).
It's a good point Evgeny, however I would still think that the benefit of letting people clarify their question or response outweighs the possibility of someone changing the content completely.
Also, once there is a proper up-vote and down-vote in place, people won't have to add "+1" comments anymore :)
Timur - what did you use for an RSS client? I usually use Thunderbird and I am told the feed is invalid.... :(
(moved)
Bravo Luca - this is great news for our customer base!
Scott,
Code.InterSystems.com was launched but then not advertised because of the Developer Community effort. It is still supported and will remain open and available until such time as all functionality is available on the Developer Community and all content has been moved to make it accessible here. Feel free to make use of that site until you see announcements about it being moved. It works with InterSystems SSO so you can use your existing account.
Ben
+1
I think that members should own their own content and be able to edit or delete it (just like Facebook)