To implement a secure and scalable multi-tenant architecture in InterSystems IRIS using namespace isolation and role delegation, you can follow best practices focused on data isolation, resource control, and secure access management.

1. Namespace Isolation for Data Segregation

Namespaces in IRIS allow logical separation of data and code, making them effective for multi-tenancy:
- Each tenant should have its own namespace. A namespace can access its own default database, ensuring tenant-specific data is isolated.
- You can enhance control by mapping routines, globals, or specific portions of data into tenant-specific namespaces to further isolate databases [1].

2. Control Resource Usage

• Databases per Namespace: Store routines and globals in separate databases for better manageability and performance [2].
• Journaling and Mirroring: Enable journaling for recovery scenarios and consider database mirroring for high availability [1]. Set namespaces in production environments to support interoperability if needed for tenant integrations [2].

3. Role Delegation and Access Control

• Use Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for managing privileges. Associate resources (e.g., databases, services) with specific roles and grant permissions like Read, Write, or Use. This ensures that a tenant’s users have access to only allowed resources [3][4].
• Use Role Escalation: Applications associated with certain namespaces can temporarily elevate privileges (e.g., assigning roles dynamically to authenticated users when accessing higher privilege operations within their namespace) [5].
• Group tasks or privileges into roles for users (e.g., TenantAdmin role with permissions to manage tenant resources). A role can inherit privileges from other roles to reduce configuration complexity [3][4].

4. Security Best Practices

• Enable encryption mechanisms for sensitive tenant data in databases. Encryption at rest and in transit ensures data is safeguarded against unauthorized access [6].
• Consider using robust authentication methods such as LDAP with delegated authorization for centralized and scalable user access management [7].
• Assign roles dynamically to users authenticated via mechanisms like LDAP, Kerberos, or OS-based authentication. This dynamic handling ensures scalable multi-tenancy while securing access effectively [8].

5. Monitoring and Scalability

• Ensure logging and audit capabilities are enabled to monitor any access or configuration changes that could impact tenant environments [3].
• For high-volume tenant data, you can use techniques like sharding, which allows you to horizontally scale data processing throughput by distributing data across multiple nodes [9].

InterSystems IRIS provides the flexibility, security, and scalability required to create a robust multi-tenant application while isolating tenant data and enabling secure resource management.

Sources:

To analyze and tune parallel query execution in the InterSystems IRIS SQL engine for complex joins, you need to focus on the available profiling tools, query processing configurations, and tuning utilities provided by the platform.

Analyzing Parallel Execution

1. EXPLAIN and Show Plan: Use EXPLAIN or Show Plan to interpret and view detailed execution plans of your queries. This will highlight if and how parallelism is being utilized, including subplans for tasks distributed across threads. These tools enable you to understand the choices made by the optimizer and adjust accordingly [1].

2. SQL Process View: The "SQL Activity" view in the System Management Portal lists currently running SQL statements. You can drill down to see query plans and diagnose performance issues, particularly for long-running queries. This feature simplifies identifying concurrency bottlenecks [2].

3. Query Statistics: The SQL Performance Analysis Toolkit allows you to gather detailed runtime statistics, such as execution count, time, and average rows processed, to analyze query behavior systematically [3][1].

Tuning Parallel Execution

1. Enable Parallel Query Processing:

   • System-wide Parallel Processing: Configure this via the Management Portal (System Administration → Configuration → SQL and Object Settings) or programmatically using $SYSTEM.SQL.Util.SetOption("AutoParallel", 1). When enabled, the SQL engine automatically evaluates which queries benefit from parallelism [4][5].
   • Query-specific Parallel Processing: Use the %PARALLEL keyword within the FROM clause of specific queries to suggest parallel execution for selective workloads [5].

2. Optimize Query Plans with Hints:

   • The %STARTTABLE and %PARALLEL keywords provide explicit directions to the query optimizer to utilize specific tables or parallel processing strategies for joins in complex queries [6][5].
   • Ensure indices are on optimal columns to avoid unnecessary temporary files and improve join efficiency [1].

3. Shared Memory Configuration:

   • Parallel queries use the generic memory heap (gmheap) for inter-process communication. Ensure sufficient gmheap size to accommodate high concurrency scenarios, especially with large data sets. Monitor and adjust gmheap as necessary through the Management Portal [4].

Additional Considerations

1. Tune Tables: Use the TUNE TABLE command to gather or refresh table statistics for accurate query plan generation based on current data distribution [3].

2. Query Complexity: While parallelism benefits aggregate queries (e.g., SUM, AVG, GROUP BY), it may not be effective for queries with correlated subqueries or process-specific functions. Analyze query patterns carefully [4][5].

3. Diagnostic Notes in Plans: In newer IRIS releases, query plans provide notes identifying predicates used for selectivity estimation and specific runtime-related performance decisions [2].

By leveraging tools like Show Plan, configuring parallel options, and aligning your schema design with system capabilities, you can successfully profile and optimize parallel query execution for large-scale joins.

Sources:

To optimize predicate pushdown in IRIS embedded SQL with dynamic joins, follow these best practices:

1. Use of Optimized Joins and Filters

• Ensure that the filter conditions applied in your SQL query involve fields indexed in the database. Proper indexing facilitates predicate pushdown by allowing the SQL optimizer to apply filters at the storage level instead of memory.
• Avoid overly complicated WHERE clauses or joins that may impede the optimizer's ability to simplify and push down predicates efficiently [1][2].

2. Leverage the %SQL.Statement Class for Dynamic Queries

• When writing dynamic queries, prepare your statements explicitly, and use bound parameters (?) to ensure that filter values can be pushed down to the database engine. For example:
  objectscript
SET sql = "SELECT Name, Age FROM Person WHERE Age > ?"
SET stmt = ##class(%SQL.Statement).%New()
SET status = stmt.%Prepare(sql)
  This approach ensures that runtime conditions in the query are evaluated close to the data source [3][1].

3. Optimizer Hints for Complex Joins

• Use SQL optimization hints like %INORDER, %FIRSTTABLE, or %NOFLATTEN to guide the optimizer in determining the sequence of table processing and hint at optimal join strategies for your queries.
• For example, using %NOFLATTEN prevents subquery flattening and keeps filters within the subquery context, which can aid predicate pushdown:
  sql
SELECT Name, Home_Zip FROM Sample.Person
WHERE Home_Zip IN
(SELECT Office_Zip FROM %NOFLATTEN Sample.Employee) [2].

4. Query Plans and Statistics

• Always analyze the "Query Plan" to verify whether conditions are being pushed down or if optimization can be improved. Tools like EXPLAIN or "Show Plan" in the Management Portal can provide insights on how filters are executed [4][1].

5. Minimize Data Movement

• Avoid fetching large intermediate datasets only to post-process them in ObjectScript. Instead, perform all filtering (particularly resource-intensive filtering) within the SQL statement itself [1].

By adhering to these strategies, you can maximize the performance of your dynamic SQL queries by forcing filter execution closer to the data storage layer.

Sources:

Yes, you can implement row-level security in InterSystems IRIS using class parameters and runtime filters. This feature ensures a high level of database security by selectively enforcing access control at the level of individual rows. Here's how you can achieve this:

1. Enable Row-Level Security:

   • Define the ROWLEVELSECURITY parameter within the class definition. Setting ROWLEVELSECURITY to 1 activates row-level security and uses the default %READERLIST property to store the access list for rows.
   • Alternatively, specify a custom property to hold the access list by setting ROWLEVELSECURITY to the property name. In this case, you will need to define an index on the property.

   Parameter ROWLEVELSECURITY = 1;
   // or
   Parameter ROWLEVELSECURITY = "CustomPropertyName";
   Index %RLI On CustomPropertyName;
   

2. Define a Security Policy:

   • Implement the %SecurityPolicy() class method, which specifies the roles or user names allowed to access a row. This method returns a string of comma-separated user names or role names allowed to view the row.

   ClassMethod %SecurityPolicy() As %String [ SqlProc ]
   {
      QUIT "User1,RoleA"
   }
   

3. Compilation:

   • After defining the parameter and the security policy, compile the class and any dependent classes.

4. Runtime Enforcement:

   • The security policy is dynamically checked at runtime each time a SELECT query is executed. This ensures that only authorized users have access to specific rows.

By combining these configurations, you can enforce user-specific row access in both SQL queries and ObjectScript applications [1].

Sources:

Bitmap indexes in InterSystems IRIS can significantly improve analytical query performance in a hybrid OLAP/OLTP workload in certain scenarios, but there are considerations for their use:

Effectiveness for Analytical Queries

Bitmap indexes are well-suited for queries involving operations like AND, OR, and COUNT, or conditions on fields with low cardinality (i.e., a small number of unique values). These indexes use compressed bitstrings, enabling quick logical operations, highly reducing disk and cache usage [1][2].

Analytical queries against fields with low selectivity (e.g., categorical values) can benefit the most. For example, if you queried transactions filtered by a type column using a bitmap index, the engine processes only rows matching specific conditions, optimizing query performance while minimizing IO [1][3].

Caveats with Concurrent OLTP Updates

In volatile environments with frequent inserts, updates, and deletes, maintaining bitmap indexes can become inefficient. This is because these operations may fragment the storage of bitmap data over time, reducing its optimization benefits. Also, these indexes are unsuitable for columns with high cardinality—large numbers of unique values—which further affects the performance of both queries and updates [1][3].

Maintenance of Bitmap Indexes

To ensure bitmap indexes remain efficient in such OLTP-heavy environments:
- Compress Bitmap Indexes: Regularly use utilities such as %SYS.Maint.Bitmap.OneClass or %SYS.Maint.Bitmap.Namespace to compress these indexes and restore storage efficiency. These tools can be run on a live production system [1].
- Monitor and Analyze: Use the SQL toolkit to analyze the effectiveness of bitmap indexes in query plans. If they degrade performance due to fragmentation or unsuitable use cases, consider replacing them with other index types [1].

Additional Recommendations

• For columns with distinct values exceeding the efficient threshold (10,000–20,000 unique values), or where row-by-row updates are high, consider using standard indexes instead of bitmap indexes [1].
• Combine bitmap indexes with other strategies, such as columnar indexes, for workloads that require both row-based OLTP performance and columnar analytical query efficiency on numeric fields [1][3].

By carefully considering cardinality, maintenance requirements, and monitoring tools, bitmap indexes can effectively support mixed workloads in IRIS systems.

Sources:

You can build a distributed and robust custom job scheduler in InterSystems IRIS with CRON-like rules, retry policies, dependencies, and failover recovery, but it will require leveraging and extending several available tools and methods.

Starting Points

1. Using InterSystems IRIS Task Manager:
   While the built-in Task Manager is not entirely sufficient for your needs, it allows you to create and manage tasks programmatically using the %SYS.Task class. You can also create custom tasks by subclassing %SYS.Task.Definition and implementing the OnTask() method, which will execute the desired task logic. This provides an extendable base for custom scheduling capabilities [1][2].

2. Custom Use of CRON-like Expressions:
   The iris-cron-task library available on InterSystems Open Exchange provides an easy way to create CRON-like task schedules. Install the package using ZPM (zpm "install iris-cron-task") and define tasks with CRON syntax. For example:

   ##class(dc.cron.task).Start("MyTask", "0 * * * *", "do ^MyRoutine", 1, .taskid)
   

   This can help automate periodic tasks without needing to set up additional classes [3][4].

3. Distributed Execution with Enterprise Cache Protocol (ECP):
   To distribute execution across nodes, consider using ECP for coordinating tasks between application servers and data servers. ECP settings allow for high availability and recovery from network interruptions, which can help maintain distributed execution [5].

4. Retry Policies and Failover Recovery:
   For robust retry and failover, you need a combination of:

   • Task retry using Task Manager's built-in functionalities (SuspendTaskOnError and rescheduling options).
   • Configuring the system's high availability (mirroring, clustering, or virtualization) to ensure task processing continuity during node failures [6].

Enhancing with Dependencies

Handling task dependencies will require creating a mechanism that executes a task only after the completion status of its dependent task is confirmed. For this:
- Use %SYS.Task programmatically to check the history and status of tasks by querying task execution records.
- Implement this logic in your custom task class or use a wrapper to manage workflows through dependency-based triggers.

Final Recommendation

Modifying or extending the framework via %SYS.Task alongside integrating iris-cron-task or ECP functionality seems practical for your described requirements. You may also refer to the suggested methods for logging, reporting, and ensuring fault tolerance.

Sources:

To optimize multi-shard SQL queries in an InterSystems IRIS sharded cluster, you can implement the following strategies:

1. Co-Shard Related Tables: When two large tables are frequently joined in queries, shard them using the same shard key. This ensures that the rows to be joined are stored on the same shard, enabling efficient local joins and reducing data transmission across shards [1][2][3].

2. Design Shard Keys Carefully: Use shard keys that distribute rows as evenly as possible across shards. The default is the RowID, but specific fields can be chosen if this improves query performance for frequent operations like joins or aggregates [2][4].

3. Define Optimal Indexes: Use indexing methods tailored to query patterns:

   • Standard indexes for commonly queried columns.
   • Bitmap or bitslice indexes for columns with few distinct values and range queries respectively.
   • Columnar indexes for efficient storage and query processing in analytical workloads [4].

4. Query Optimization with Distributed Execution: InterSystems IRIS decomposes queries into shard-local operations executed in parallel. Minimize network overhead by designing queries that allow most of the work, such as joins or filters, to be performed locally on the shards [4][5].

5. Use the Query Optimizer: Make sure the database is tuned properly for your data and queries:

   • Regularly run the Tune Table operation to update table statistics, ensuring the optimizer selects effective query plans.
   • Utilize runtime hints, if necessary, to guide the query optimizer [4][5].

6. Leverage Parallel Processing: Enable parallel query execution to distribute query workloads across processors or threads. This is particularly useful for complex queries or large data sets [6][7].

7. Avoid Limitations on Sharded Queries: Be aware of unsupported features for sharded tables, such as certain aggregate functions or nested aggregates. Designing queries within these supported patterns ensures better performance and reliability [4][5].

By following these strategies, you can enhance the performance of distributed SQL queries in your IRIS sharded cluster and maximize the platform's capabilities for large-scale data workloads.

References: [1][4][2][5][3].

Sources:

Implementing a lock-free, concurrency-safe traversal over large global structures for real-time analytics in InterSystems IRIS can be optimized by carefully utilizing functions like $Order() or $Query(). Here are steps and considerations for such an approach:

1. Lock-Free Traversal with $Order():

   • $Order() allows you to navigate node-by-node through the global structure, returning the next (or previous) subscript at a specified level. It works without mandatory locking, which is suitable for concurrent environments. Use $Order() to iterate through your data efficiently:
     objectscript
SET key = $Order(^YourGlobal(""))
WHILE key'="" {
// Process the node
SET key = $Order(^YourGlobal(key))
}
     You can choose forward (1, default) or backward (-1) traversals with the direction argument [1][2].

2. Optimized Data Fetching:

   • Utilize the third argument of $Order() to also retrieve the value of the node simultaneously, minimizing the overhead of multiple global accesses:
     objectscript
SET key = ""
WHILE (key='') {
SET key=$Order(^YourGlobal("",1,Value))
WRITE key,": ",Value,!
}

3. Avoid Gaps with $Query():

   • Use $Query() for traversing globals in sequential order while skipping undefined nodes. This can be more efficient in cases with sparse data:
     objectscript
SET node = $Query(^YourGlobal(""))
WHILE (node'="") {
// Process the node
WRITE @node,!
SET node = $Query(@node)
}
$Query() provides the next global node's full reference and implicitly omits undefined nodes [3].

4. Concurrency Considerations:

   • While both $Order() and $Query() are safe for use in lock-free access patterns, concurrent modifications to nodes may cause iteration to omit or include unintended elements. Real-time loads should therefore focus on ensuring no destructive updates are performed by other processes during traversal.

5. Real-Time Applications:

   • With a focus on read-heavy real-time analytics, these methods avoid the overhead of locks and ensure the global structure remains responsive. Using $Order() and $Query() lets you scale analytics with concurrent readers effectively.

These methodologies allow implementing fast and non-blocking access to data stored in globals for real-time operations [1][2][3].

Sources:

Choosing a shard key in InterSystems IRIS for long-term scalability involves the following best practices:

1. Default System-Assigned Shard Key (SASK): Using the RowID as the shard key usually guarantees an even distribution of data and supports efficient parallel data loading and query processing. This approach is often the best for workloads where queries are randomly distributed across the dataset [1][2].

2. Cosharded Joins: If your application performs frequent joins between large tables, using shard keys that enable cosharded joins is critical. Tables that share the same shard key allow local joins within each shard, improving query performance significantly. Equivalent user-defined shard keys (UDSKs) or the use of the COSHARD WITH keyword can ensure this optimization [1][3][2].

3. Unique Constraints: Ensure that unique constraints on sharded tables include the shard key as part of the unique key. Unique constraints that span across shards can severely impact performance [1].

4. Consider Query Patterns: Analyze queries to ensure shard keys align with frequent filter conditions, joins, and group-by operations. This will reduce cross-shard data movement and improve efficiency [1][3].

5. Avoid Sharding Complex Transaction Tables: Tables involved in complex atomic transactions should not be sharded because sharding complicates ensuring atomicity [1].

6. Flexible Schema Design: Plan for scalability by co-sharding related tables or combining sharding with vertical scaling as necessary. InterSystems IRIS also supports hybrid arrangements where application servers work with data shards for distributed computing [4][2].

By adhering to these practices, you reduce the likelihood of encountering performance bottlenecks and avoid requiring major refactoring as your database scales. [1][2]

Sources: