I like this proposal, and would like to be in the conversation... It would be helpful to send out a survey with those questions (and more) and dump the results in an LLM and argue about the responses collectively in that discussion.

There is a divide in the open exchange between tech examples, etc and integrations, drivers, etc that cultivate maintenance because they are in use and chasing versions... your work is in this category for sure with the python dbi driver, lately go, etc.    These projects need to be pulled from Open Exchange immediately, or just be placeholder that point to an opencollective (as an example), I think OpenExchange is giving the illusion that OSS is being supported in some way, but not in the ways you listed above.  There is also a proliferation of github projects out there with the two words "intersystems" and "community" slammed together in some shape or form out there that gas light this subject.

Id pipe up during this call and probably blather on about the following:

Are there any examples other than the above that are based on a derivative proprietary work ?
What are the previous attempts at this ? I think Globals java was Open Sourced, Id like to undrstand the legal behind that and understand the shortcomings/successes of that...I think rzf may be something on the horizon, any others ?

Id like to understand what went on with the VSCode extensions as an example and have that play out differently with oss too.

I have fallen in the trap of being in between these worlds, OSS and proprietary software and want to share the experience... in a nutshell, I got these two responses:  InterSystems: you cant resell that.  OSS (spark library), Apache2: you cant distribute that.

Ultimately I think what needs to happen is we go out on our own and provide incontraverable value and have some thick skin, knowing that intersystems can fork it at anytime and "do it better" or resist "selling" the project in any shape or form.  We'd also need to dismiss any wind that internally at InterSystems "its in the backlog" and not let that deter development.

InterSystems would have to look at the community output/features/governance, along with the 5 pillars you listed above, and know that they would be better off funding the project externally than doing it themselves. Also, if its important enough, allowing for them to provide priorities in the development... we would need to be meticulous around the release cycles of IRIS too.

Ill tell you that when I saw your post about the Go Library and immediately framed a project that I well know could take advantage of your library with a ++, and would push InterSystems hand in this regard... it may be a cool excercise to see what would happen if the Go library were forked immediately under an Apache2 license or something.  I have a good idea here.

The elephant in the room is the legal needed to avoid violating agreements ourselves, crossing InterSystems boundaries to maintain a healthy collaboration, or allowing some other company to fork it and bury it in their monitoring app or something without acknowleding the component in their solution... The open collective pilot would help shake out some gaps for sure.

I think we could all use our Global Masters points to score a bunch of socks or something and sell them on ebay to start an initial fund to derive percentages, org structures, yadda yadda.

Im in, and would prioritize attending and contributing to the discussion.

same

from the screenshot, looks lke you need MTC_88* in the BlobNamePattern field, not the prefix.  The prefix is essentially a key (folder), and the BlobNames are the objects.

currently you are looking in s3://MTCbucket/MTC_88/

good turn out here, congrats all.

Thank you for getting this out there, has been super frustrating understanding some of these errors while using these drivers with the promise of DB-API.  At least the distribution has gone public with maven, pypi, etc as a step in the right direction and hopefully will help things, especially with the drivers being the "front door" to alot of the cloud offerings.

The alchemy workaround for compatibility is especially great.

After further review of the play, this app is a touchdown.  

Great work/contribution @Dmitry Maslennikov 

Hi Adam,

Consider setting up a rule in your pipeline, so that it only executes if you merge to a particular branch.  I know your use case seems to be "PR approval" not merge, but the below rule will only execute on merges to main.

There are other free variables in the pipeline to maybe accomplish what you want.
 

  rules:
    - if: '$CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "merge_request_event" && $CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_NAME == "main"'`

This is a very good post on the subject that is exhaustive you may want to checkout:

https://community.intersystems.com/post/continuous-delivery-your-intersy...

variables:
  SESSION_NAME:
    value: "IRIS"
  NAMESPACE:
    value: "ACME"

stages:
  - deploy

deploy main:
  stage: deploy
  tags:
    - dev
  before_script:
    - export WORKING_DIR=$(pwd)
  script:
    - echo "Initializing ACME CI/CD Build DEV..."
    - echo "Deploying code ${CI_MERGE_REQUEST_SOURCE_BRANCH_NAME} branch to instance..."
    - |
      /usr/bin/irissession ${SESSION_NAME} <<EODEPLOY
      ${IrisUser}
      ${IrisPass}
      zn "${NAMESPACE}"
      w ##class(%SYSTEM.OBJ).LoadDir("${WORKING_DIR}/src","ck",,1)
      set sc = ##class(Ens.Director).UpdateProduction()
      EOFDEPLOY
  rules:
    # only runs if merged to main
    - if: '$CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"'

I hit this too...

Instead of a query, try a dbtable with a query wrapper to a temp_table...

.option("dbtable", "(SELECT name,category,review_point FROM SQLUser.scotch_reviews) AS temp_table;") 

check this post for full in and out with jdbc to databricks.

https://community.intersystems.com/post/databricks-station-intersystems-...

I use these globals to take a peak at the calls:

	zn "YOURFHIRNAMESPACE"
	Set ^FSLogChannel("all")=1
    zn "%SYS"
    Kill ^%ISCLOG 
	Kill ^ISCLOG 
	Set ^%ISCLOG=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","HSFHIR")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","HSFHIRServer")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","OAuth2")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","OAuth2Server")=5

then
 

zw ^FSLOG

in the fhir namespace.

Shows the route, params and helpful with oauth2/SMART where the route has to match the patientid in the token.
 

Michael, if you drop the generated token into https://jwt.io, does Okta have the the list of scopes in an `scp` parameter?

I recall having to do something like this in an Interaction Strategy to get ValidateToken() to work with Okta, wondering if the same is necessary for ValidateJWT().

 

		Do JWTObj.%Set("client_id", OktaJWTObj.cid)
        Do JWTObj.%Set("scope",OktaJWTObj.scp)

This illustrates a particular subject that seems to be getting some traction in the FHIR community as a "FHIR Interceptor"... personally I have implemented this competency using an api manager (Kong, API Gateway) through an integration layer (function) prior to hitting IRIS which works but splits the business logic in two differnet places.

Your way here keeps the "intercepts" in IRIS and the resource server which I like.

Here is the "intercept layer" concept ablaze: https://darrendevitt.com/building-a-fhir-intercept-layer/ 

This is ridiculously good work, the implementation of the custom operation and the fact it is a patient merge is fantastic.  I have found native object de-duping, deepdiff, and two line list de-duping in python to be a way to quickly get to the point with FHIR Resource pair manipulation. 

Thank you for taking the time on this, most likely going to have to read it a few times and load it up on my eReader.

One thing I'd add to tips and tricks from something I stole from someone somewhere:

     zn "<FHIRNAMESPACE>"	
    Set ^FSLogChannel("all")=1
    zn "%SYS"
    Kill ^%ISCLOG 
	Set ^%ISCLOG=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","HSFHIR")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","HSFHIRServer")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","OAuth2")=5 
	Set ^%ISCLOG("Category","OAuth2Server")=5

Seems to give up a good mix of  token processing and fhir calls debuggery.