@Henrique Dias , if you could also publish a fixed version in a public IPM? That needs a release issuing in Open Exchange. Thank you!
- Log in to post comments
@Henrique Dias , if you could also publish a fixed version in a public IPM? That needs a release issuing in Open Exchange. Thank you!
Hi @Henrique Dias !
Thanks a lot for taking a look! I really like your app and got addicted, and I hope it will work again and help me and others.
Another question: where can I see uvicorn logs while working with the container?
Thanks @Dmitry Maslennikov !
Tried to use Field(ge=0) for one of the fields - doesn't work.
from dataclasses import Field
is presented. What could be the issue?
And I agree that dev docker container is probably the most effective way to make changes to a development project.
What a fantastic demo! Bravo and thank you, @Pravin Barton !
I second that git-source-control is “must-have” ipm module if you build Interoperability solutions with IRIS.
And demo nicely works through the process.
Nice article! Thanks for sharing!
The only caveat is that the password in Interoperability Credentials is stored in plain text.
It'd be great to have this mechanism updated to a more secured version.
Maybe we could organize a kind of voting for orphaned packages - "voting" opportunity will appear after 24 months of no-activity. And, say, 5 or 10 votes from different members-contributors to OEX can move the package to a "dark corner".
Oh, great! Could you please also issue a new release to let the new code be in a package?
Great stuff! @Eduard Lebedyuk - share on Open Exchange and IPM, please!
Hi @Kari Vatjus-Anttila ! Thanks for sharing! Do you want to publish the Github repo on Open Exchange to expand the audience?
@Dmitry Maslennikov , thanks for the attempt! What stops today from introducing the Index for VectorDB in IRIS?
Could you please delete the files from repo that are not related to your solution to avoid the confusion?
Yes, if you apply again with the same app "previous" bonuses don't count. only for the new functionality.
Sergey, it is a good attempt, but you need to justify every aspect of current management portal substituted with your one. From what I saw you introduce a new interesting functionality and sometimes you use links to the current portal.
Article is considered.
community images with IPM onboard are available too:
intersystemsdc/iris-community:preview
and
intersystemsdc/irishealth-community:preview
Thanks, @Dmitry Maslennikov ! Yes, you used Python and avoided ObjectScript where possible finding new limits - thanks for that! The bonus point is provided.
Hi @Muhammad Waseem ! Bonuses are implemented
It's a good idea! Do you mean to have the UI on DC to prepare an email invitation to join DC to a friend developer with a standard invitation text?
The whole question is "Why Business Operation and Outbound Adapter" and not "Inbound Adapter and Business Service" for the incoming data for the production obtained from REST API?
Looks cool! But the video is needed to understand the helpful functionality
Yes, that's a pain. That's why we suggest the naming convention of everything in lowcase for UDL class packages.
wow. @Jeffrey Drumm , do you want to publish the class on Open Exchange too?
I'm not the one who can answer as I'm on Mac, but I hope there are developers on Windows who are happy with Docker and can share their experience
Yes, I agree. I really saw InterSystems IRIS based solutions with IAC approach. But it's great to have a tool that could help! Thanks for creating and supporting it, @Alex Woodhead
And if you use Docker for your dev environment you will never face such a problem.
Or install the package - it should help.
Hi @Pietro Di Leo !
In the discussion provided by @Luis Angel Pérez Ramos there is another code by @Alex Woodhead
you can use that will change not only "undefault" settings:
set pSettings(<itemName>,<target>,<settingName>)=<settingValue>
do ##class(Ens.Production).ApplySettings(<productionName>, .pSettings)