Previous version of my reply was for the storage order for data stored. Sorry.

The compute triggers, %%INSERT and %%UPDATE are, in my opinion the best option. They are specifically supported for this purpose and are completely seamless between SQL and Objects. Callbacks and other options may not be seamlessly supported by both filers.

Our JPL implementation, called "ASQ", is not very fast (yet, we are working on that) but it works well for small sets of data.

LATEST:USER>:pp obj.apply("$[*].items[*].externalPositions[*]")
do ##class(%ASQ.SetUtils).pp(obj.apply("$[*].items[*].externalPositions[*]"))
[
  {
    "pureId": 0,
    "appointment": {
      "uri": "string",
      "term": {
        "en_GB": "Some text"
      }
    },
    "appointmentString": {
      "en_GB": "Some text"
    },
    "period": {
      "startDate": {
        "year": 0,
        "month": 1,
        "day": 1
      },
      "endDate": {
        "year": 0,
        "month": 1,
        "day": 1
      }
    },
    "externalOrganization": {
      "uuid": "196ab1c9-6e60-4000-8b89-29269178a480",
      "systemName": "string"
    }
  }
]

I agree - $system.external is the correct interface. You should be able to find out more about the $system.external interface by calling $system.external.Help().

Dynamic SQL doesn't have to build the query solution every time you run the same statement. Once you initially prepare an SQL Statement, the implementation of that statement is cached and reused. The only overhead should be limited to a hopefully very brief cache resolve. There are ways that you can write a statement that makes the hashing algorithm we use very inefficient (prepare:execute ratio p:n, the larger 'n' is, the better - 1:1 being the worst). Since we now use a unified model, even embedded SQL will produce a cached implementation. Embedded reduces the cache resolve time.

@Andre Larsen Barbosa - I am the author of the intiial dynamic SQL 'feature'. I no longer work in this area and many significant enhancements have been made since my initial work. That said, I applaud your article. It is quite nice.

There is one feature that not many people know about - there is an Object mode that you can use with Dynamic Statement. Object mode is interesting when your query selects column values whose underlying type is a IRIS ObjectScript Class that is an object type (Persistent, Serial, Stream). Here is a trivial example of how it might be used.

LATEST:USER>set statement = ##class(%SQL.Statement).%New()

LATEST:USER>set statement.%ObjectSelectMode = 1

LATEST:USER>do statement.prepare("select name,address from person")

LATEST:USER>set result = statement.execute()

LATEST:USER>write result.%Next()
1
LATEST:USER>write result.name
po1
LATEST:USER>write result.address
7@User.Address
LATEST:USER>write result.address.city
Boston
LATEST:USER>write result.address.state
MA

    set stream = ##class(%Stream.FileCharacter).%OpenId("/Users/.../data/continents-en.json")

Did you know that you can just open a file as a stream?

And for iterating - this has been in the product for a while now. This is the code for my :pp alias.

ClassMethod pp(set As %AbstractSet, offset As %Integer = 0)
{
#define QUOTE(%val) $zu(144,1,%val)
    try {
        set isLabeled = set."_isLabeled"()
        if (isLabeled) {
            write "{"
            set close = "}"
        } else {
            write "["
            set close = "]"
        }
        set it = set.iterator()
        while it.hasNext() {
            set next = it.next()
            if $isobject(next.value) {
                write !,?(offset+2)
                write:isLabeled $$$QUOTE(next.key),": "
                do ..pp(next.value, offset + 2)
            } else {
                write !,?(offset+2),$select(isLabeled:$$$QUOTE(next.key)_": ",1:""),$$$QUOTE(next.value)
            }
            if it.hasNext() {
                write ","
            }
        }
        write !,?offset,close
    } catch exc {
        write !,"Exception caught: ",exc.AsSQLMessage()
    }
    return
}

This is in %ASQ.SetUtils. My alias, pp - pretty print, is this:

pp        do ##class(%ASQ.SetUtils).pp($*)

Basically the same as Enrico's:

LATEST:USER>set result = $system.SQL.Execute("select * from %SYS.Namespace_List()")

LATEST:USER>do result.%Display()
Nsp    Status    Remote
%SYS    1    0
B360    1    0
USER    1    0

3 Rows(s) Affected

The PackageDefinition class contains only packages where we need to keep metadata about a package. Most packages do not have any extra metadata.

The SQL solution is the correct solution IMO. If I were a developer on the Object team I would advocate for a method in $system.OBJ - PackageExists(<package_name>) perhaps. :)

I was tempted to criticize the Mixtral response. I did implement the original versions of both of these items so I know them both well. The Mixtral code example for %SQL.Statement is incorrect in a few ways but I'm surprised that it was as close as it is.

Once that temptation was put aside, I realized that Mixtral can only analyze what it finds. If it can't find the solution then perhaps our class documentation is not going to provide the answer to a user. Hmmm...

Actually, the problem is that %Exception.AbstractException already has five parameters. The error message you received is because the fifth argument has a type of %Exception.AbstractException and your fifth argument has a type of %String.

It is entirely possible to override the implementation of a member inherited from a super class so long as the inherited member is not defined as final and the signature of the local override is compatible with the inherited signature. The class compiler does perform a signature check to ensure the class does not violate the prime directive: Every instance of a class is implicitly a valid instance of its primary super class. Rewording that slightly - the interface of a class must be compatible with the interface of its primary super class. You can add new parameters to an inherited method but the existing parameters, those inherited, must declare a compatible type. A compatible type can be more specific (a subclass of the inherited type) but it cannot be a competely different type.

I tried adding a sixth parameter and also corrected the type of the fifth:

This class compiled cleanly.

ObjectScript does not allow method overloading which is a different thing.

I like @Norman W. Freeman 's answer. That is the factory pattern and I use it regularly. %OnNew is a single method that is implemented in each class. There is a little known feature of %OnNew - it can return an oref whose type class is different from the class that implements %OnNew. In other words, %OnNew can be that factory method. Norman's Create() solution is cleaner IMO. The sole advantage (again, IMO) of a polymorphic %OnNew() is that it works with %New. I can provide a demo is anyone is interested.

Sorry - I just read Matt Gage's reply. My reply is redundant.

I am a huge fan of try/catch. The try is virtually cost-free with overhead only encountered when an exception is caught. I do agree with Jon Willeke - when I am in older code I normally do not refactor $ZTRAP unless the changes I have to make are more than a simple edit. I also use RETURN when exiting a function/method instead of QUIT.

It is possible to simluate a finally but it isn't as nice as having a real finally block would be.

And the first two lines can be combined:

set str = ##class(%Stream.FileCharacter).%OpenId("c:\myfolder\file.csv")

%KillExtent should not be used in production except in very controlled circumstances. It was meant for use in a development environment. It's only advantage is that it is fast.

The simplest answer is that %KillExtent performs a physical delete of the extent (data and indexes) while %DeleteExtent performs a logical delete. The physical delete does not enforce any constraints and does not invoke referential actions. The logical delete does enforce all constraints and  performs referential actions.

Thank you for that information. I researched this and was told that we support Java 8+, not just 8 and 11. We submitted a request to correct the documentation.

You should be able to use Java 17 now for your projects. Are you specifically asking for when we will support Java 17 (and perhaps later versions) when using External Java Server/Java Gateway? If that is the case then I believe you can do that in 2024.1.0.