Ponnumani, if my reply above is sufficient for you please click the checkmark alongside its header. This marks the answer as accepted. Not sure which checkmark I mean? Below is an annotated screenshot:

Consult the product information here and the documentation here.

Sean, I assume the </h1> tags are supposed to be </h2>

And if any of the ZWRITE output includes the string </pre> then all bets are off, right?

Have you considered implementing a Caché source code management tool such as Deltanji from George James Software, for whom I work? A Deltanji workflow can propagate code from one namespace to another, and can also propagate deletions. In other words, if you decommission a class in DEV, then propagate the now-decommissioned code object to TEST, the class will be deleted from TEST.

If you don't mind working a the global level, here's a way of enumerating the classes that are stored in the default code database of a namespace:

USER>s namespace="%SYS"                                                          
USER>s impliedNamespace="^"_##class(%SYS.Namespace).GetGlobalDest(namespace,"^oddDEF")
 
USER>w impliedNamespace
^^c:\intersystems\ens171\mgr\
USER>s className="" f  s className=$o(^|impliedNamespace|oddDEF(className)) q:className=""  w !,className

The page at https://download.intersystems.com/download/atelier.csp tells you how you can obtain the 1.1 beta provided you are using Atelier as an Eclipse plugin rather than as a standalone Eclipse-based application.

I don't know if the current 1.1 beta fixes this issue, nor if it will require a version of Caché greater that the current 2017.1 release in order to solve it (or indeed to work at all).

Yes, the CSP Gateway can be on a webserver in the DMZ, accessing data from a server in the protected zone.

Full doc about installing and configuring the CSP Gateway is here.

Comprehensive documentation here and here.

Murali, if this or any other answer to your question is useful/accepted please remember to click the checkmark alongside it.

Chris, I'm interested to know why you're not mirroring your code as well. What do you do to make sure that if the secondary takes over from the primary it'll be running exactly the same code as was running on the primary? Or don't you want it to do that?

Settings stored in the XData block of the production class (e.g. values entered through Portal) trump any System Default Settins values.

In Portal there's this button to get you to a page that may help you understand what's going on:

For a long time I've complained that the Portal UI makes it too easy to override a System Default Settings value (which is namespace-specific) with a value that gets stored in the production class (which you might migrate from one namespace to another). Add to this the fact that Portal ignores source control when altering the production class

I'm not able to answer your question, but I think you'll have a better chance of finding someone who can do if you edit your post and tag it with Ensemble and HealthShare. Also worth mentioning that the "Developer Community" tag is primarily intended for feedback about the DC software itself.

Here's the base implementation of this method in %Library.GlobalIdentifier (2017.1 version):

 /// If a persistent class is GUIDENABLED then this method can be called to override the default GUID assignment.
/// This method accepts a guid value and returns the override value currently assigned. The return value will only
/// differ from the supplied value if the override is unsuccessful. It is only valid to call this method on a new object.
/// The guid value passed to this method is not validated. It is up to the user to make sure the guid is properly formed.
/// The guid assignment does not actually occur until the object is saved. If the object has already been assigned a GUID
/// or if the GUID override value has already been assigned to another object then the GUID override value will be discarded.
/// The check for GUID value uniqueness and a GUID value previously assigned is done only at the time the object is saved and is
/// not performed by this method.
Method %OverrideGuidAssignment(pGUID As %Library.CacheString) As %Library.CacheString
{
set i%"%%GUID" = pGUID
quit i%"%%GUID"
}

If I understand Alex correctly, he's calling this method in order to force a new instance of a GUIDENABLED class to have a specific GUID instead of getting one automatically assigned at save. He's not overriding the class in his own class definition.

I have highlighted in yellow some sentences in the comment that may be relevant.

I have also highlighted in pink the sentence Alex quoted, which is a bit unclear. By "return value" I think it means the GUID of the object instance after the save has subsequently been performed.