go to post John Murray · Aug 21, 2017 I don't see an ISC Staff indicator as meaning the post is inherently more valuable or more reliable. Rather, that a lot of posts are by people without that indicator, including posts that get lots of positive votes. I think this could help counter any impression that DC is some kind of "WRC-lite".
go to post John Murray · Aug 21, 2017 I previously posted a request for display of which participants are InterSystems staff:https://community.intersystems.com/post/there-way-telling-if-poster-memb...
go to post John Murray · Aug 21, 2017 Currently we don't seem to have a good way of reminding/encouraging the OP to accept answers. If we add a suitable comment to their post, this means everyone gets the impression there's new information on that post, which rises to the top of the "most recent" list.Maybe DC could periodically send each user a list of their questions that have at least one answer but none yet accepted.
go to post John Murray · Aug 21, 2017 Please give us more context. Where is the question arising from? It looks a bit like a homework assignment after a class covering a specific area of the COS language.
go to post John Murray · Aug 18, 2017 Expanding on [@Jonathan Pham]'s suggestion, I recommend you take a look at my article here:https://community.intersystems.com/post/diagnosing-cause-errors
go to post John Murray · Aug 18, 2017 Nancy, to help with DC housekeeping, please re-post your comment as an Answer, then set the checkmark against its title so your original question disappears from the "no answer" and "unanswered" views.
go to post John Murray · Aug 18, 2017 I guess I could add a little backdoor into this method as well; a screen door, if you will, on my back door. A smart catflap?
go to post John Murray · Aug 18, 2017 I think you could do the job with our RE/parser tool.Disclosure: I work for George James Software.
go to post John Murray · Aug 18, 2017 I agree Robert. After discussing with some of my fellow moderators I've also relocated this post to the Announcements group, because posts to the Developer Community Feedback group don't appear on the homepage (by design). I have also changed it from Question to Article, otherwise you're going to be expected to "accept" one of the answers
go to post John Murray · Aug 17, 2017 I have just posted an article here about how to determine whether a class is mapped.
go to post John Murray · Aug 17, 2017 Thiago, maybe re-post your Comment as an Answer. That way the OP can set the checkmark alongside your answer, so the question no longer lists as "unanswered". Plus, you get credit.
go to post John Murray · Aug 17, 2017 Tom, maybe re-post that information as an Answer rather than a Comment. Then you can accept your own answer (set the checkmark alongside it), so your question no longer lists as "unanswered".
go to post John Murray · Aug 17, 2017 AFAIK we users aren't able to change increase this value. If we could, we might be tempted to set it to a very large value See [@Robert.Cemper]'s answer for how you can decrease it.
go to post John Murray · Aug 15, 2017 Today I am seeing this being caused by a post whose <pre>...</pre> block of SQL code got snipped part way through. No </pre> tag got added, so the rest of the page is monospace font.
go to post John Murray · Aug 15, 2017 Pedro - good to see that DC members were able to help. Now please set the "accepted answer" checkmark that only you (as OP) are able to set. If you're unsure where to look, see my screenshot below:
go to post John Murray · Aug 14, 2017 Maybe worth adding that the two MS packages can be run with command line options suitable for unattended use, e.g.vcredist_x86.exe /passive /norestartFor a dialog box showing all the command line options:vcredist_x86.exe /helporvcredist_x86.exe /?I wish an unattended install of Cache would install these runtime prerequisites automatically for us. I think it does that when doing an interactive install, which would imply that the vcredist_x*.exe kits are already bundled inside the cache*.exe installer.
go to post John Murray · Aug 14, 2017 Adding to the other answers, I notice the OP wrote "I need my globals unreadable if other process is in critical area". This means you will need to obtain LOCKs before referencing (reading) the globals. But in this case you might opt to request shared LOCKs, e.g. LOCK +(^A#"S",^B#"S",^C#"S") WRITE !,"^A=",^A,!,"^B=",^B,!,"^C=",^C,! LOCK -(^A#"S",^B#"S",^C#"S") The use of shared locks will allow multiple concurrent reader processes, while still blocking all readers if a writer holds conflicting locks. A would-be writer will also be blocked while any readers still hold conflicting locks.
go to post John Murray · Aug 14, 2017 Robert, your first doc link is actually for $TEST. The link for LOCK is http://docs.intersystems.com/latest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=...