Search

on fhir using javascript. The source code i got from "https://github.com/Asymmetrik/graphql-fhir" here i tried to save patient informations mutation{ PatientCreate(id

;br> <a href = "123" >Word3</a> When I add iFind index on text, there are at least two problems: Words like moreinfo="none">Word1, so exact match

to associate a consent policy with an MPI ID that does not yet exist. If that MPI ID is later created and assigned to a patient, the previously associated consent policy will be applied

" } ], "kind": "resource", "abstract": false, "type": "Patient", "baseDefinition": "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient", "derivation": "constraint

-making and patient care. ## how it works - IRIS Interoperability: Receives messages in the FHIR standard, ensuring integration and compatibility with healthcare data

: SELECT * FROM Sample.Company WHERE Mission LIKE ‘% agile %’ That is quite the reasonable query, but how does it perform? Well, with no index it clearly has to read each entry

Hi,I've built a custom HL7 searchtable, but wish to remove some of the items.I've removed the items I no longer wish to index recompiled the custom searchtable, however

Current triage systems often rely on the experience of admitting physicians. This can lead to delays in care for some patients, especially when faced with inexperienced

an A02 for the first transfer, and the second a DTL for the second transfer. Many receiving systems will have an issue with this, though, as both patients temporarily end up

Hi, How can I define composite primary key in Cache? Thanks Hi, The 'New Index' wizard allows you to add various properties to the index. Or, manually, you could have

Hi, In Cache Studio under the View/Find in Files. Anyone knows how to search multiple words in the string? For example,In my routines 1, it has "Patient Name Test Name

Registry, I only have Patient Relationships, but Patient-Clinician Relationships, Relationship Definition and Move Patient-Clinician Relationships are missing. Can anyone help me out

post an answer* I found the following in HS.Message.PatientSearchRequest.cls: /// Search modes user - regular patient lookup, admin - mpi patient lookup no consent applied

to access the same global data through SQL-mapped classes. I have two questions regarding this approach: If I define indexes in the SQL-mapped class, what potential impact

the same thing in MSSQL via LinkedServer and it unsurprisingly yielded the same result.) I'm suspecting this has to do with indexes, possibly? The only reason I say