If you want to reorder JSON properties (alphabetically or just put some of them at the beginning) then use a utility method, like this, especially if you have several object(types) to reorder

Class DC.Utility Extends %RegisteredObject
{
/// Reorder a JSON Object or Array
/// 
/// obj:  JSON-Object
/// 	  ord: prop1, prop2, ...	Desired order for (some) properties
/// 	       (Properties not listed are copied in the order in which they were created)
/// 	       If ord not present, properties will be reordered in aplphabetical order
/// 	       
/// obj: JSON-Array
/// 	 ord: pos1, pos2, ...	Desired order for (some) array items
/// 	      (Items not listed are copied in ascending order)
/// 	      
ClassMethod ReOrder(obj As %DynamicAbstractObject, ord... As %String)
{
	i obj.%Extends("%DynamicObject") {
		s new={}, itr=obj.%GetIterator()
		i '$g(ord) {
			while itr.%GetNext(.k) { s done(k)=0 }
			s k="" f  s k=$o(done(k)) q:k=""  d new.%Set(k,obj.%Get(k))
		} else {
			f i=1:1:$g(ord) { s k=ord(i),done(k)=1 d:$e(obj.%GetTypeOf(k),1,2)'="un" new.%Set(k,obj.%Get(k)) }
			while itr.%GetNext(.k,.v) { d:'$d(done(k)) new.%Set(k,v) }
		}
		
	} elseif obj.%Extends("%DynamicArray") {
		s new=[], itr=obj.%GetIterator(), max=obj.%Size(), done=""
		f i=1:1:$g(ord) { s k=ord(i) i k,k<=max d new.%Push(obj.%Get(k-1)) s $bit(done,k)=1 }
		while itr.%GetNext(.k,.v) { d:'$bit(done,k+1) new.%Push(v) }
		
	} else { s new=obj }
	
	q new
}
}

Some examples

s car={"color":"red", "fuel":"diesel", "maxspeed":150, "maker":"Audi", "model":"Quattro Q5", "power":300, "available":true, "rating":8, "allWheel":true }
s car1=##class(DC.Utility).ReOrder(car) // order all props alphabetically
s car2=##class(DC.Utility).ReOrder(car,"maker","model","available") // start with maker, model, etc.

w car.%ToJSON(),!,car1.%ToJSON(),!,car2.%ToJSON() --->
{"color":"red","fuel":"diesel","maxspeed":150,"maker":"Audi","model":"Quattro Q5","power":300,"available":true,"rating":8,"allWheel":true}
{"allWheel":"1","available":"1","color":"red","fuel":"diesel","maker":"Audi","maxspeed":150,"model":"Quattro Q5","power":300,"rating":8}
{"maker":"Audi","model":"Quattro Q5","available":"1","color":"red","fuel":"diesel","maxspeed":150,"power":300,"rating":8,"allWheel":"1"}

Is NOT the same. You can it prove by adding a label to the line with the read command and a new line at the end

    // DOT VERSION
    // Use fic
old Read *R:20 Else  Do  Quit    ;;;;  comando else aplicado a read.
    . Use 0 Write !!!,"Expired time."
    If $c(R)="a" d
    . Use 0 Write !!!,"A letter a has been read."
    . Quit
    write !,"If there are more lines, they will be executed",!
    quit

    // LITTLE BIT MODERN VERSION
    // Use fic
new Read *R:20
    If $Test {
    Use 0 Write !!!,"One character read"
    Quit
    }
    Else {
    Use 0 Write !!!,"Expired time."
    }
    write !,"If there are more lines, they will be executed",!
    quit
 

now let run both of them...

do old // let the timeout occur
do old // now with some input
do new // let the timeout occur
do new // now with some input

Do you see the difference? If there are more lines (at end) they will be executed in opposite cases (timeout/notimeout)

Things are not so easy as they seem, you have to consider scopes too. Take the above class (DC.LineNumber) and add three more methods:

ClassMethod CaseA(x)
{
    if x goto zTest
    quit "A0"
    
zTest quit "A1"
}

ClassMethod CaseB(x)
{
    if x goto Test
    quit "B0"
    
Test quit "B1"
}

ClassMethod Test()
{
    write ..CaseA(0),..CaseA(1) set linenumber=..SrcLineNumberFromStack(.routine,.label,.offset,.src) do prt
    write ..CaseB(1),..CaseB(0) set linenumber=..SrcLineNumberFromStack(.routine,.label,.offset,.src) do prt
    quit
    
    // debug
prt	write !,"routine: ",routine
    write !,"label: ",label
    write !,"offset: ",offset
    write !,"linenumber: ",linenumber
    write !,"src:",src,!!
}

and now do the test:

do ##class(DC.LineNumber).Test()

and check the output... 

OK, I know, this is a (very) constructed case and shouldn't coincide with an everyday development style, but who knows, what a mad programer sometimes produces...