go to post Julius Kavay · Sep 16 Assuming, your input value is an integer, you have , along with the other solutions, one more: // this works as long as len < 145 // set len = 120 set inp = 12345 write $e(1E120_inp,*-len+1,*) // of course, if the len is shorter than, say 10, // then you can use smaller constans like // set len=10 set inp=9 write $e(1E10_inp,*-len+1,*) A good (or even a bad) side effect of the above solution is, if you get an input value which is LONGER than the length, it will be truncated to the given length
go to post Julius Kavay · Sep 3 By the way, if you need again and again a local timestamp with decimals, just create a user defined system variable. Make a one line entry into the %ZLANGV00.mac routine: %ZLANGV00 ; User defined (system) variables // Local timestamp with decimals ZLTS() quit $now($ztz-$s($SYSTEM.Util.IsDST():60,1:0)) You can use whatever name you want as long as it starts with Z, contains uppercase chars only and do not conflict with existing names. Use it as a standard $-variable write $zlts, $zdt($zlts,3,1,3) 67086,85681.092746 2024-09-03 23:48:01.092
go to post Julius Kavay · Sep 3 Together with $now() and timezone adjustment you can have the desired result for time=$h, $now($ztz-$s($SYSTEM.Util.IsDST():60,1:0)) write time,?20,$zdt(time,3,1,3),! // assuming 60 min summertime offset // // you should get an output like thisL 67086,83334 2024-09-03 23:08:54.000 67086,83334.1341026 2024-09-03 23:08:54.134 There is an (old) undocumented function which gives the $h value with several decimal places, unfortunately the recommended replacement is more or less the above solution instead of a simple $zlts (z-local-timestamp).
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 28 This is possible, but you have to use it the correct way. $SYSTEM.OBJ is just a shorthand for ##class(%SYSTEM.OBJECT), so the correct syntax for your desire is: job ##class(%SYSTEM.OBJ).Export("yourRoutine.mac","yourPathAndFilename.xml")
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 22 in a routine or class, the line ClassMethod ALine() { quit $st($st,"MCODE") } gives you the line quit $st($st,"MCODE") The systemvariable $zname gives you the name of the routine, where you reference $zname and in a classmethod $this gives you the name of the class
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 13 We need the source code, so the compiler flag for keeping the source must be on. The 38 char version does the job ClassMethod ascii() [ ProcedureBlock = 0 ] { x n i f i=32:1:126 w:$t(x)'[$c(i) *i } The 34-character version does the job too has a side effect (leaving the variable i with the last value) ClassMethod ascii() [ ProcedureBlock = 0 ] { y f i=32:1:126 w:$t(y)'[$c(i) *i }
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 9 It shouldn't be invalid because there are no corresponding constraints. At the beginning, I thought not to participate, because of the problematic specification and example, but now, as I see, I'm not the only one with questions without answers, hence I offer an 38 char solution too (including the hint to compiler flags) and a shorter version with 34 chars, a correkt result but with "a little bit" of side effect.
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 9 The problem is, the specification for this task is simple unprecise, and according to my opinion, gives a faulty example. Your exmple code has just a Set command but the task talks about "print out" - hence, I expected to see either a Write "whatever" or at last a Quit "whatever" comand.Also, if we talk about a method signature, I take in account the number of arguments (maybe their types) only and the return type but never their method keywords, as in the solution from Eduard, hence his solution is not only creative but valid too.I think, a fair way to mesure the size of a solution is, if you take the size of the routine which will be executed, and that is the INT routine, which is directly (we neglect the possible compiler optimizations, that's the compilers and not the users credit) compiled into a executable. How I got that code (some generator or via a macro or whatever other method) is actually irrelevant.A very good example for using or not using a method keyword is the "codemode=expression": /// you save that "Quit " but have to write "codemode=expression" /// which is not taken in account by the Implementation.Size ClassMethod Test() [ codemode = expression] { 123 } /// you have to write "Quit " and save the writing of "codemode..." /// The Implementation.Size counts that "quit " ClassMethod Test2() { quit 123 } Whatever you choose, the corresponding INT code is always "quit ..." So the bottom line is, either you should define all constraints and conditions or accept each end every clever solution.
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 7 ClassMethod TimeDiff(inpTime = "2024-08-07 17:58:51.563") { set current=$h // or $now(tz-offset) set inpTime=$zdth(inpTime,3) quit current-inpTime*86400+$p(current,",",2)-$p(inpTime,",",2) }
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 5 First convert the dynamic array to a Cache List and then the Cache List to Python List - voila the job is done /// Convert a dynamic array to a Cache List /// ClassMethod ArrayToList(arr) { q:'arr.%Size() $lb() s list="", it=arr.%GetIterator() while it,it.%GetNext(.key,.val) { s typ=arr.%GetTypeOf(key) s list=list_$case(typ,"object":$lb(val.%ToJSON()),"array":$lb(..ArrayToList(val)),"null":$lb(),:$lb(val)) } q list }
go to post Julius Kavay · Aug 2 First, I presume, the Studio lacks such a functionality because usually each nsp contains independent data. As an example, for each of my customers (applications) I have an dedicated namespace (of course, you may say, one can allways have an exeption), and second, if there is no readymade functionality, then make your own. Sometimes it takes longer asking questions or searching the internet then writing a quick-and-dirty "one liner", something like this: // classdefinitions are stored in ^oddDEF, mac-routines in ^rMAC // as said above, quick-and-dirty: // if the SEARCHTERM occurs in %-items, then you will get multiple hits // // the one-liner version k n i ##class(%SYS.Namespace).ListAll(.n) s n="" f s n=$o(n(n)) q:n="" f s="^|n|rMAC","^|n|oddDEF" f s s=$q(@s) q:s="" w:@s_s["SEARCHTERM" s," ",@s,! // for folks with less experience // ClassMethod SearchAllNSP(searchterm) { i ##class(%SYS.Namespace).ListAll(.n) { s n="" f {s n=$o(n(n)) q:n="" f s="^|n|rMAC","^|n|oddDEF" { f s s=$q(@s) q:s="" w:@s_s[searchterm s," ",@s,! } } } } It's up to you to left out all those multiple %-items and to add some formatting... So the bottom line of my answer is: yes, there is a way to search (whatever you want) in one go
go to post Julius Kavay · Jun 23 Class DC.BigJSON Extends %RegisteredObject { ClassMethod Test(filename) { if ..SaveToFile(..MakeJSON(), filename) { write "Save OK",! write "Size ",##class(%File).GetFileSize(filename),! set input=##class(%File).%New(filename) set sts=input.Open("RS") if sts { set json={}.%FromJSON(input) set iter=json.%GetIterator() while iter.%GetNext(.key, .val) { write "key=",key," size=",$l(val)," data=",$e(val,1,10)_"...",! } } else { write $system.Status.GetOneErrorText(sts),! } } } ClassMethod MakeJSON() { set obj={} set obj.text1=$tr($j("",3600000)," ","a") set obj.text2=$tr($j("",3600000)," ","b") set obj.text3=$tr($j("",3600000)," ","c") quit obj } ClassMethod SaveToFile(obj, filename) { set file=##class(%File).%New(filename) set sts=file.Open("wnu") if sts { do obj.%ToJSON(file) do file.Rewind() use file.Name do file.OutputToDevice() do file.Close() quit 1 } else { quit sts } } } The size shouldn't be a problem USER>do ##class(DC.BigJSON).Test("/tmp/test1.txt") Save OK Size 10800034 key=text1 size=3600000 data=aaaaaaaaaa... key=text2 size=3600000 data=bbbbbbbbbb... key=text3 size=3600000 data=cccccccccc...
go to post Julius Kavay · Jun 22 The first part (Base 64 encoding is not able to encode ... unicode (2 byte) characters) is correct. The second part (data-->utf8-->base64 and base64-->utf8-->data) is correct only if there is an agreement beetwen the sender and receiver about the double-encoding (utf8+base64). If I was told, I get a base64 encoded file then I expect a file which is only base64 encoded and not a mix of several encodings including base64. A simple way to encode your document could be something like this: ClassMethod Encode(infile, outfile) { // file-binary reads bytes and not characters set str = ##class(%Stream.FileBinary).%New() set str.Filename = infile set len = 24000 // len #3 must be 0 ! set nonl = 1 // no-newline: do not insert CR+LF do str.Rewind() open outfile:"nwu":0 if $test { use outfile while 'str.AtEnd { write $system.Encryption.Base64Encode(str.Read(len),nonl) } close outfile } quit $test }
go to post Julius Kavay · May 30 Take a look at the classes $system.Security and $system.License, whichever better fulfills your needs
go to post Julius Kavay · May 29 Sadly, I haven't a shorher solution than yours but another one (with the same size) ClassMethod Count(s) { q $l($tr(s,")]}D>"_s,1E4)) }
go to post Julius Kavay · May 28 It seems the task definition lacks the preciseness and you have the power of observation. What about this? ClassMethod Count(s) { q $l($tr(s,")]}>","DDDD"),"D")-1 }
go to post Julius Kavay · May 28 In the past we got challenges with a better definition... ;-(( ☹ In the original post, I'm pretty sure, there were")s)).:D :~) ;~D :) xD ))" instead of")s).:D :~) ;~D :) xD" and"(smiley) ))" instead of"(smiley)" Nevertheless, "Sadness >:( :[ :{ :(" ---> you say: 0 > I say: 1 (0 Eyses, 0 noses 1 mouth) and there is no rule about interspace requirements My quick solution: ClassMethod Count(s) { while $locate(s,"[:;8B=]?[co\^~-]?[\)\]\}D>]",$g(i),i),$i(n){} q +$g(n) } /// If one accepts "" as 0 then change +$g(n) to $g(n) /// I would like a solution as (see the + char in regex) /// but then the rules should be changed /// ClassMethod Count(s) { while $locate(s,"[:;8B=]?[co\^~-]?[\)\]\}D>]+",$g(i),i),$i(n){} q +$g(n) }
go to post Julius Kavay · May 15 According to your definition, "A number is Esthetic if ... between every pair of its adjacent digits ...", the test example test.assert_equals(esthetic(1), [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]) is wrong, because the number one (1) converted in whatever number base is always 1. Looking on that 1 I do NOT see any ADJACENT digit(s), except you define that a single digit is always an esthetic number (but I do not see such a definition). justmy2cents
go to post Julius Kavay · May 13 If your system does not support JSON (i.e. pre 2016.2?) then give this "dirty trick" a try: - add a zero-width-space character to your numbers- create the output stream- remove the zero-width-space characters Instead of the zero-width-space you can use any other character too, which does not appear in your data (binary data should be base64 encoded). ClassMethod WithQuotes() { set zwsp = $c(8203) // zero-width-space set obj = ##class(%ZEN.proxyObject).%New() set obj.ID = 1234_zwsp set obj.Number=123.45_zwsp if ##class(%ZEN.Auxiliary.jsonArrayProvider).%WriteJSONStreamFromObject(.tmp,obj) { set json=##class(%Stream.TmpBinary).%New() do tmp.Rewind() while 'tmp.AtEnd { do json.Write($tr(tmp.Read(32000),zwsp)) } } do json.Rewind() write json.Read(json.Size) }