All
Accepted answers
Robert Cemper · Jan 23, 2024 go to post

eventually terminal in *UX may end just with $c(10)
could you try to append some blank + semicolon ?

:alias enablebi do EnableDeepSee^%SYS.cspServer("/csp/"_$zcvt($namespace,"L")) ;

You seem to lose the last character

Robert Cemper · Jan 23, 2024 go to post

I agree with @Brett Saviano:
$$$  ...refers to some #define ...  and is a compiler directive

I tried:

USER>:alias wi write "/csp/"_$zcvt($namespace,"L")
 
USER>:wi
write "/csp/"_$zcvt($namespace,"L")
/csp/user
USER>:alias wi1 write "/csp/"_$$$LOWER($namespace)
 
USER>:wi1
write "/csp/"_$$$LOWER($namespace)
 
WRITE "/csp/"_$$$LOWER($namespace)
^
<SYNTAX>
USER>
Robert Cemper · Jan 22, 2024 go to post
  • my personal preference goes to %GSIZE.
    The best match between CONSUMED and ALLOCATED size is found
    if your Global is "filled" total sequentially by a $Q() loop.
    And even then with a big string, you may force unexpected block splits.
    The situation changes if you fill your globals by subscript levels.
    This may cause a cascade of block splits and result  in rater unattractive packing percentages
     
  • ALLOCATED Size by Subscript might be of interest for an individual Subscript.
    Though adding them up doesn't reflect the total size
    It's like cutting a cake to 12 people and then counting the heads that had some cake.
     
  • to reduce the space consumption of your globals I rather suggest to  use
    ##Class(%GlobalEdit).GloabelCompact()  to eliminate the effects of random inserts
    and growth inside a global tree.
      
Robert Cemper · Jan 19, 2024 go to post

from my local Class docs:

GetGlobalSizeBySubscript
This method will return the size of a global based on the number of database blocks the global resides in.

so you get blocks * blocksize ===> ALLOCATED size
Depending on Packing as %GSIZE shows   The difference might be significant

Summary by Subscript will most likely show higher values as a pointer block
or even a data block (eg. with 8kb) may contain more than a single subscript
depending on the Global structure.
Take the default top subscript  (aka. IDKEY) for Caché classes (Integer, >0) as an example ​​

Robert Cemper · Jan 19, 2024 go to post

tSC is mostly a %Status object
with enough experience Zwrite tells you all you want and need to know
$SYSTEM.Status.DisplayError(tSC) is easier read.  a matter of comfort

Robert Cemper · Jan 19, 2024 go to post

ChatGPT is just stupid and has no idea of IRIS / Caché
A TABLE will by default never have the same name as the GLOBAL that stores the content
>>>> HS.IHEX.RecordHistory and the global ^HS.IHEX.RecordHistory  <<<<<
HS.IHEX.RecordHistory is definitely not a handcrafted table.

Robert Cemper · Jan 19, 2024 go to post

Thanks for the recognitions!  😀🖐
It's a very strong motivation to be productive.
Often to distract from personal struggles.
Many thanks to the DX+OEX+GM team for their help! 👏 🌸🌼🌹🌻💐

Robert Cemper · Jan 19, 2024 go to post

Hi @Daniel Aguilar 
for every DB you have a default collation that is tied to DB:
you can see it in SMP  System > Configuration > Local Databases > Database Properties

this is the standard.
If the collation of your source server is Spanish, German, Fench, , .... 
the DB may have used this national collation as default.
On your target serve you need to have this collation to be installed.
in SMP  System > Configuration > Locale Definitions you see what is installed on your Caché instance

You may need to add the missing collation table to your Caché instance:



 

Robert Cemper · Jan 16, 2024 go to post

in the previous screenshot you see the namespace as a blue link
and the names of the DB in the yellow highlighted  
 

Robert Cemper · Jan 15, 2024 go to post
  •  iristerm does NOT support ssh
  • you need to run ( + install ?) a SSH service in your  Linux SUSE 15 VM 
  • next, you connect from Win10 over any SSH terminal client (e.g. Putty, ...) to your SuSe VM console command line
  • there you can run iris session ...........  (the Linux equivalent of iristerm)

Just as described in your question

Robert Cemper · Jan 12, 2024 go to post

check if the date object  var d=new Date();
is inside your routine or at least globally defined

Robert Cemper · Jan 12, 2024 go to post

take a look to Mgmt Portal and check NAMESPACE definition
to see DB-file vs. Namespace.
In your case, I'd create a new namespace based on your DB-file to avoid conflicts.
>>> the same Db for Routine (=code) and Globals

Robert Cemper · Jan 11, 2024 go to post

Big CONGRATULATIONS to all winners !
It's a pleasure to follow your contributions.

Robert Cemper · Jan 8, 2024 go to post

%Studio.Project).InstallFromGbl(...  rejects explicitly for Versions before 2013.1 in line 1440

  • ...   ("VERSION")),".",1,2)<2013.1  ..... 
  • ...  Set sc=$$$ERROR($$$DplyVersion, .....
  • %occErrors.inc(2547): #define DplyVersion 7602

You better contact WRC for help  with this 10 year old version

Robert Cemper · Jan 5, 2024 go to post

Bonsoir Sylvain!
Are you looking for something similar to this;
 

Property MonJour As %String 
     [ InitialExpression = "31/12/1840" ];

Property Jour As %Date [ InitialExpression = 0,
  SqlComputeCode = {set {*}= $ZDH({MonJour},4) },
  SqlComputed, SqlComputeOnChange = MonJour ];

(Multiline just for readability)
 

Robert Cemper · Jan 5, 2024 go to post

Thanks for the test data!
It confirms known behavior:

  • Oracle takes a lot of effort to prevent straightforward comparisons
  • But over decades, I haven't ever seen them winning against IRIS / Caché.
  • OK, and PostgreSQL or MySQL never was competitive,

Great job !

Robert Cemper · Jan 3, 2024 go to post

#1)  what type of "routine" do you try to handle ?

  • .cls
  • .mac
  • .int
  • .obj

#2) what is the Format you get those "routines"

  • .ro
  • .xml
  • .udl

some combinations may allow  "command line" examination 

Robert Cemper · Jan 3, 2024 go to post

there is a basic misunderstanding:

inside the <CSP:WHILE...> block you are in HTML context
but you issue instead JavaScript >>>> which just prints it out.
To illustrate this see this simple example:
But changing to JS_context solved my simple demo with alert();
 

<csp:WHILE CONDITION="resultSet.Next()">     

 <!-- xValues.push(#(resultSet.Get("StatsDate"))#)
  yValues.push(#(resultSet.Get("Value"))#) -->
  
 <p>#(resultSet.Get("StatsDate"))#<br>#(resultSet.Get("Value"))#</p>
 
 <script LANGUAGE="JavaScript">
 alert(#(resultSet.Get("StatsDate"))#+'>>>'+#(resultSet.Get("Value"))#);
 </script>

</csp:WHILE>
Robert Cemper · Dec 29, 2023 go to post

Great Stuff!
This matches seamlessly to the  "real" Customer benchmark I did in 2009 (with Caché)
against PostgreSQL and MySQL
Years went by but the principles haven't changed.

  • keep memory consumption low
  • data transfer between memory and "disk" (or what mimics a disk) is the
    the slowest component of your system (except human user) so keep it as flat as possible

Glad to see that this is still as valid as it was since ever.
After so many years, all new technology tricks didn't change that.

Robert Cemper · Dec 26, 2023 go to post

It is still in IPM. OEX seems to have lost it.  ???
 

zpm:USER>search global-dump-sql
registry https://pm.community.intersystems.com:
global-dump-sql 1.0.2
zpm:USER>install global-dump-sql
 
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Reload START (C:\InterSystems\IRIS\mgr\.modules\USER\global-dump-sql\1.0.2\)
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Reload SUCCESS
[global-dump-sql]       Module object refreshed.
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Validate START
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Validate SUCCESS
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Compile START
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Compile SUCCESS
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Activate START
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Configure START
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Configure SUCCESS
[USER|global-dump-sql]  Activate SUCCESS
 
Just providing the global name results in a full global dump.
Example:
USER>zn "user"
IRISAPP>d $system.SQL.Shell()
SQL Command Line Shell
... select TOP 5 * from zrcc_G.dump where zrcc_G.Dump('^%SYS','"JOURNAL"')=1
Robert Cemper · Dec 25, 2023 go to post

Thank you Maksym !
You reached 100% ObjectScript.
I was really impressed by your Part2 on day 23 + 24