Hey @Dmitry Maslennikov , awesome job!

Have you thought about using WebSockets with a simple HTML/JS setup for your terminal, as the VS Code extension does? If you've already tried that and moved on, I’d love to know why. If not, it’s a super easy approach, and I’m sure you’ll have it working in no time.

Just create a WebSocket connection:

const socket = new WebSocket("ws://localhost:8273/api/atelier/v8/%25SYS/terminal");

Then hook it into your terminal like this:

term.onData(data => socket.send(data)); // Send input to the server

I did some tests and got a working terminal. It’s not as smooth as VS Code Lite or yours, but it's close! Let me know if you want to dive deeper.

I am having this same problem and I am using the latest extension. 

I added the 

"http.proxyStrictSSL": false

to the User settings.json , which is the same as

But still getting the error: 
 

Check your server details in Settings (vgorillaaws[VGORILLA]).

request to https://ec2-x.x.x.x.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/api/atelier/ failed, reason: self signed certificate

I am using [2.5.0] - 2024-05-02 InterSystems Language Server

Thanks! And nice tips and lovely explanation,  now everything is making more sense. 

Regarding the pure Python approach, I am still struggling with how to use it in a much simpler way. Your last example is still too complex for a very simple scenario of one or two python files. 

Let me explain. I have this class in the file hello_world.py

class HelloWorld:
    def sayhello(self):
        print("Hello, World!")
        return "you did it!"

Then I would like to use it doing something like: 

Class dc.boto Extends %RegisteredObject
{

ClassMethod test1() [ Language = python ]
{
    from hello_world import HelloWorld
    # Create an instance of HelloWorld
    greeting = HelloWorld()

    # Call the say_hello method
    ret=greeting.sayhello()
    print(ret)
}

ClassMethod test2()
{
    Set hello = ##class(%SYS.Python).Import("/iris-shared/python/hello_world.py")
    Write hello.sayhello()
}

}

But this is throwing ModuleNotFoundError errors. 

I don't know if I have to create a packet and import it with pip... if so, it will be still complex. 😌
Is this possible? Do you see my point?

I am not sure what you need or are looking for. If you want to list all the routines, you can do it by looping on the ^ROUTINE global. There are some other methods using System libraries to get this information. 

As a quick example, you can copy-paste the following code directly into the terminal to see if this is what you need: 

// In one line: 
SET routineName="" FOR  SET routineName=$ORDER(^ROUTINE(routineName)) QUIT:routineName=""  WRITE routineName, !

// More readable: 
SET routineName = ""
FOR {
    SET routineName = $ORDER(^ROUTINE(routineName))
    QUIT:routineName=""
    WRITE routineName, !
}

Great article!

I've gained a clearer understanding after reading it. However, I'm struggling a bit with your example. It seems a bit complex, especially for those of us who are new to integrating ObjectScript with custom Python classes and routines. A more straightforward example would be really helpful.

Your code particularly draws attention to the use of this class:

ClassMethod GetPythonInstance(
	pModule,
	pRemoteClassname) As %SYS.Python
{
    set importlib = ##class(%SYS.Python).Import("importlib")
    set builtins = ##class(%SYS.Python).Import("builtins")
    set sys = ##class(%SYS.Python).Import("sys")

    set module = importlib."import_module"(pModule)
    do importlib."reload"(module)

    set class = builtins.getattr(module, pRemoteClassname)
    return class."__new__"(class)
}
 

Could you elaborate on the rationale behind this specific structure, particularly the inclusion of builtins, importlib, and sys? Is there a simpler alternative you might suggest?

In my own projects, I've been using embedded Python with the Python tag, which usually is enough due to its simplicity and speed. However, as you mentioned, it lacks certain features. Eventually, I end up with numerous embedded functions, repeatedly importing the same libraries for each method, which looks cluttered. See:
 

ClassMethod moveFile() [ Language = python ]
{
    import boto3,iris
    # do stuff
}

ClassMethod getFile() [ Language = python ]
{
    import boto3,iris,json,datetime
    # do stuff
}


At this juncture, adopting your strategy to transfer all code to a .py file (not as a class) seems like a viable option, then accessing these methods via ObjectScript. I'm inclined to avoid Python classes due to their complexity and the need for instantiation. I prefer using functions for their simplicity and ease of understanding. What would you recommend in this scenario? How would calling code looks like? 

 

These warnings suggest a performance problem with the CPU and disk bottlenecks. 

If you are running very intensive processes, you should see these warnings go away after they finish. However, if you keep seeing them continuously, I recommend going deeper and analyzing the performance. 

Analyzing the performance takes time, and it's not always easy for non-experts. There is a great series of articles written in this community that can help with this: 

https://community.intersystems.com/post/intersystems-data-platforms-capa...

If you don't want to go through all these series and can easily increase the system resources, it would be an easy way to probe and solve the problem ;-). What I mean by increasing system resources is by adding more CPUs and faster disks. Nowadays, with Virtual machines and cloud systems, this is quite simple. 

And let me insist again, if this is a production system, you may want to open a WRC problem for extra help. Having the disk too stressed will end in User/Application pauses. 

This is not a nice error to see in a production environment. If this is a production site, I recommend contacting the Support department. 

To find the problem, you can look at the messages.log. There should be an error written with more details.

Most of the time, these errors are related to disk permissions or disk stress. Tools like ^SystemCheck and/or ^SystemPerformance will gather the required information to diagnose the problem. If you contact Support, they will probably ask for this. 

As it is not a class method you need either to create/open an object for the class or rewrite the method as ClassMethod (instead of Method). But as the SetSensor call is also pointing to the same object (See do ..SetSensor), the simplest would be to create/open the object:

set obj=##class(Package.YourClass).%New()
do obj.ResponseTimeCurrentMonth("USER")

You may also need to add some Writes to the terminal to see something. For example:

write  !,"Date:",InDate
write  !, "time taken:",timeTaken


    

Hi Andy, 

If you have problems with production servers, I advise contacting Support directly. (Looking at the question's date, you may have contacted us already).

The issue you show here is not common and can be related to file permissions (reinstalling may help) or a product bug. To diagnose the problem, Support may need to ask you for more details, logs, etc.