Great project, @Henrique.GonçalvesDias!

Sent you a small pr.

I have three questions:

1. Why CSP instead of REST? It doesn't seem too highload of an app, being an admin tool essentially, so I just wonder why you decided to go with CSP.
2. Let's move filtering to the server. Currently only the last 200 messages can be retrieved.
3. Are there any plans to add visual trace? Our default visual trace is great, but when a single session exceeds 300-500 thousands of messages it's not as responsive. So I've been searching for a enhanced tool for session viewing.

Check xmlStatus, it's an error:

ERROR #6237: Unexpected tag in XML input: RawMaterialThicknessUnit (ending at line 7 character 29).

You need to either specify all properties or define this parameter in both classes:

Parameter XMLIGNOREINVALIDTAG = 1;

Check this discussion.

General approach is - create bash fine with required commands and call it from Jenkins.

Ensemble uses $$$GetLocalizedName macro to get localized settings names.

You can add caption directly:

set ^CacheMsg("EnsColumns","en-us","HelloWorld")="Hello World"

Where HelloWorld is a property name, value is a caption and en-us is a session language.

It should work like this:

ClassMethod Add()
{
    quit $$$Text("@HelloWorld@Hello World", "EnsColumns", "en-us")
}

but for me it doesn't set the global. Not sure why.

As other commenters have stated you can use Python Gateway to drive Python process, in that case check this article, the Data Transfer section specifically. Also join our MLToolkit@intersystems.comusergroup - it's focused on AI/ML scenarios.

I'm a user of Python Native API so I can give the following advice. There are two cases here:

• You need to iterate the result set - in that case you may want to call %Next() and retrieve values as you go.
• You just need a complete dataset for downstream processing (your case). In that case yes, serialization is required.  I see two ways to do that: JSON and CSV. If the size of the dataset is small you can use JSON, no problem, but (I haven't run any tests but fairly sure) CSV serialization can be faster and less CPU/Memory intensive.

Looks like this is not possible by default:

You can use this trivial workaround:

set nl = $c(13,10)
set replace = "*"
set search = "MRN"
&sql(DECLARE C1 CURSOR FOR
     SELECT REPLACE(%iFind.Highlight(REPLACE(Text, :nl, :replace),:search), :replace, :nl) ...

And as long as your text does not contain replace sequence it should work.

%File provides a way to get creation and modification dates, but to set them you'll need OS level tools.

Read method does read 32000 characters by default, you can specify an amount of characters up to $$$MaxStringLength (3 641 144 characters).

If you want to set property to a stream you can do it like this:

do objInArrMain.%Set("Content", fileStreamBase64, "stream")

I'm not sure when it became available, here's a simple check code:

set stream = ##class(%Stream.TmpCharacter).%New()
do stream.Write(123)
d obj.%Set("prop", stream, "stream")

It should output:  {"prop":"123"}

One other note: you're using file streams for temporary outputs (when building fileStreamBase64), replace file stream with temp stream for better performance.

You should initialize the Signature object not with %New method, but with Create or Create509 method.

set sig=##class(%XML.Security.Signature).CreateX509(cert)

do sig.SetSignatureMethod($$$SOAPWSrsasha1)

Since ##class(%iFind.Utils).Highlight  and %iFind.Highlight  are the same method, you can pass fourth pTags argument to it:

SELECT %iFind.Highlight(Narrative,'"visibility [1-4] mile*" AND "temp* ? degrees"', , "<span>")

Another suggestion.

You can define a %ZSTOP routine which would automatically clear ^HITLIST global on job end.

You can also use PPG which would be automatically deleted when job ends.

Recommended approach - always use macros for al your GLVN needs (see: DeepSee, %Dictionary). This way reporting is easy - just open inc file and you're done.

%Compiler package contains Traveler/Visitor implementation for ObjectScript but it's not officially supported - use at your own risk.

Although the task is unfortunately unsolvable at compile-time due to the abundant meta programming, such as indirection and xecute.

In your proposed solution you can enable checkbox "Use Wildcards" in Find & Replace and search for * which is essentially everything.

<PROTECT> error means you can't access database in the /folder/NSOne_SRC/ directory.

Give the user required rights (at the very least R on that DB) and start a new session.

SMP - About (Info in Dutch) - Choose English.

Have you tried sending the message to several recipients directly? Not CC but TO:

do m.To.Insert("mail1@domain.com")
do m.To.Insert("mail2@domain.com")

Or you can send the same email object to several recipients one by one:

for to = "mail1@domain.com", "mail2@domain.com" {
    do m.To.Clear()
    do m.To.Insert(to)
    set status = ..Adapter.SendMail(m)
    do:$$$ISERR(status) $system.OBJ.DisplayError(status)
}

cpp directory was renamed into iris-callin.

python directory should be there in your dev directory.

InterSystems IRIS also offers a brand new Python Native API.

Check out community Python Gateway - a new and easy way to interface with Python from InterSystems IRIS.

Interesting article.

Note that comparison with 1 would always be the fastest regardless of where it is:

Here's your code on my PC:

Time for If: .037652 seconds
Time for ElseIf #1: .045029 seconds
Time for ElseIf #2: .057766 seconds
Time for Else: .053267 seconds

And here's a modified code with comparison to 1 third:

ClassMethod Run3()
{
    For i=1:1:4 {
        Set time(i,"start")=$zh
        For j=1:1:1000000 {
            If i=3 {
                set a=1
            } ElseIf i=2 {
                set a=1
            } ElseIf i=1 {
                set a=1
            } Else {
                set a=1
            }
        }
        Set time(i,"end")=$zh
    }
    
    W "Time for If: ",time(1,"end")-time(1,"start")," seconds",!
    W "Time for ElseIf #1: ",time(2,"end")-time(2,"start")," seconds",!
    W "Time for ElseIf #2: ",time(3,"end")-time(3,"start")," seconds",!
    W "Time for Else: ",time(4,"end")-time(4,"start")," seconds",!
}

Running this code yields these results:

Time for If: .109513 seconds
Time for ElseIf #1: .048419 seconds
Time for ElseIf #2: .029746 seconds
Time for Else: .059306 seconds

Regardless of where comparison to 1 happens it would be the fastest one.

Why is

select * from MyTable where MyFieldName like ‘%[^a-zA-Z0-9 !”%#$&”()*+,-./:;<=>?@]%’  

not a solution?

Please post query plans.

The most important  question is - are they actually taking different time to run?