Search

Indeed, that's the recommended SQL way of achieving what Eduard described about PPGs.

For example: And: This information can indeed be handy for debugging for example or keeping an eye on how the connections are working, but on an ongoing basis, especially if StayConnected

If you don't see the same problem then indeed, something might require changing on Ensemble side. Also -- try googling this error message "Invalid cursor state".

This is indeed explained here.

updateArrayReferences+40^EnsLib.RecordMap.ComplexParent.1 *%ParentAdd,User.Test.Record Checking the class specified in the message, you find that the method indicated after the asterisk is indeed

We're indeed looking into those additional windowing functions to go beyond our %FOREACH SQL extension, but it's not (yet) on the short-term agenda.

Indeed, if tested exactly as you wrote it that oref doesn't even get stored in a local variable, so ceases to exist as soon as the method call completes.

I have tried to place the code outside the while loop and it still produced less than expected messages as I would expect a message to be triggered for each patient within my response

Shift Atendimento: A queue management system solution for care management and integrated with Shift LIS, optimizes the patient’s call logistics, making it possible to know the efficiency

version: http://localhost:9092/fhir/r4/metadata Also zpm installs the simple UI which is available at: yourserver/fhirUI/FHIRAppDemo.html And you'll see something like this (with patient

In this example, I am using a patients identifier, querying a SQL database and getting back their GP details. Solution 1.

The system operators would need to give you access to the appropriate servers and secondly bear in mind that you are working with sensitive, confidential patient data and that must

When all OBXes are copied across, then use InsertAt() to insert empty OBX segments into ObjectsList, where index matches the index fromIndexList.

It also adds a few validation rules to ensure the assumptions we made (such as the idField being set to %ID) are indeed true. The second approach could be elaborated a bit more.

Thanks for your patience Scott - it's no question that this has been a little bumpy ;) But I am confident that we will get there.