Jenna Makin · Nov 8, 2019 go to post

Now you need to create a Namespace that uses your RPMS database for routines and globals.

Refer to the doc link I sent earlier on Creating Namespaces.

Jenna Makin · Nov 7, 2019 go to post

No.   You should place your FOIA CACHE.DAT into it's its own directory and then in the system management portal create a local database and namespace.   When creating the database you will identify the directory where you placed your IRIS.DAT file.

Jenna Makin · Nov 6, 2019 go to post

Hi Ignacio

I think your next step is to get your CACHE.DAT that contains RPMS up and running on IRIS.

1.     Copy your (dismounted) CACHE.DAT file to the cloud server

2.     Rename the file to IRIS.DAT

3.     Create a Database/Namespace in IRIS that uses this database file.
          (dont forget to add all of the appropriate RPMS global and routine mappings)

Once you get to this point everything else is application related and the best source for information about that would be the Indian Health Service themselves.  

Jenna Makin · Nov 2, 2019 go to post

further, the url you are using indicates that you are connecting thru the internal web server installed when you installed the instance which is intended for SMP access only and development.  You should switch to a production quality web server for SSL support

Jenna Makin · Nov 2, 2019 go to post

Hi David

SSL for a web service hosted by ISC back-end is handled through the web server.   You  need to configure the web server to handle the SSL.

This procedure involves generating a certificate and setting up the ssl connection inside the web server software.  That process varies based on the web server you are running.

Jenna Makin · Oct 30, 2019 go to post

I would do something like this.

if pVersion?1"v"1n.n {

     // Parameter is well formed vnnn

} else {

     // Parameter is not well formed

}

Jenna Makin · Oct 22, 2019 go to post

Definately would always recommend full commands.   I remember the day when we had to write code this way however it isn't the case anymore.

That said, it's good to be able to read code like this because it still exists out there.

Jenna Makin · Oct 22, 2019 go to post

This is referring to mapping between SDA and Health Insight cubes.

Please PM me so we can discuss your need further.   I am one of the Sales Engineers working with the VA.

Jenna Makin · Oct 21, 2019 go to post

Simply select the code to convert and then select Edit -> Advanced -

 And then either Expand or Compress  Commands.

Jenna Makin · Oct 21, 2019 go to post

I think full commands are much easier to read for those that might be coming into your organization and will be taking over development of your projects in the future.

It's pretty easy to convert from one to the other using the Expand and Compress commands option in Studio.

For those that might be visually impaired, it would be a lot easier to dictate expanded commands than abbreviated versions.

Just my 2 cents

Jenna Makin · Oct 20, 2019 go to post

Hi Richard-

I'm assuming you are working for or with VA as the build you mention is a specific build provided to the VA.  I don't believe that the FHIR annotations were released until version 2018.x of HealthShare.

If you can reach out to the VA sales engineers via email we'd be happy to get you a copy.

Jenna Makin · Oct 20, 2019 go to post

If you are running IRIS for Health

From the management portal, assuming you have a Foundation namespace created you can click Health -> <select foundation namespace> -> Schema Documentation -> FHIR Annotations

If you do not have a foundation namespace created, click

Health -> Install Wizard -> Configure Foundation

Enter the name for the Namespace, click Save and then click Activate

Once you have created a Foundation namespace you should be able to access the FHIR Annotations as mentioned above.

The same holds true for Health Connect instances as well, I believe.

ODS namespaces are applicable to HealthShare Unified Care Record instances and sounds like it's not applicable to your situation.

Jenna Makin · Oct 20, 2019 go to post

Neerav-

I'm not sure that you can.   From within a production you can call from one host to another, e.g. bs->bp, bs->bo, bp->bp, bp->bo, bo->bp, bo->bo, etc.

From outside the production you cant really call a bp or a bo directly.

Why do you not want to setup a bs that can route your call to whatever bp or bo you want?

Jenna Makin · Oct 19, 2019 go to post

From a business host you would use the ..SendRequestSync or ..SendRequestAsync method call.

From outside of a business host you could create a business service that took a target configname and a request message as input and use the CreateBusinessService method in End.Director to iinstanciate and call it 

Jenna Makin · Oct 11, 2019 go to post

Stephen

With regard to the name, it's just that, a name.  It doesn't have any effect on what the production can and cant be used for.

Jenna Makin · Oct 11, 2019 go to post

You can use the foundation production as a router if you want, the difference is that in that scenerio you would be adding all of the components that you needed to the production manually.   Configuring a routing production should give you the basic components needed, e.g., a service for input, a router for applying rules based routing and then an operation.   It provides the basic building blocks needed to route messages.

A generic interoperability production can route messages as well.

Jenna Makin · Oct 10, 2019 go to post

A foundation production is a production that is created using the Install Wizard and when created will include some useful business hosts for integrations

Jenna Makin · Oct 10, 2019 go to post

Stephen
An Interoperability production is a general integration production, vs a routing production is one that automatically includes some basic business hosts needed for routing messages.

Typically you would use a routing production if you wanted to route HL7 messages, for example.

An Interoperability production is a blank slate allowing you to add whatever business hosts you need.

There is no real difference in capabilities other than what is automatically created as part of the production configuration when it is first created

Jenna Makin · Oct 1, 2019 go to post

I would think that would depend on a few things.

1.   What is the size of files being sent?

2.   How much bandwidth is available to handle multiple concurrent transfers

3.   How many connections can the remote ftp server handle?

Jenna Makin · Sep 30, 2019 go to post

Hi

This can happen when you are doing class based CSP coding and forget to add the #(..HyperEventHead())# call to the header of your document

Jenna Makin · Sep 23, 2019 go to post

I would recommend getting your journal drive fixed, taking a full backup of your databases and then start journaling from there.

Whether or not you need the journals depends on how you might be using them 

Obviously they are used to recover your databases since the last backup .

They are also used for shadowing and mirroring 

Jenna Makin · Sep 22, 2019 go to post

What kind of error do you get when you try from a browser.

From a browser URL the method is Get.   Is your service Method a Get?

Could also be licensing.

Jenna Makin · Sep 4, 2019 go to post

You could throw them out into a file and then use an external diff tool.

Jenna