Thanks Evegny.

Well no error info is a little hard to work with...

But (un)fortunately I was able to reproduce this (though earlier on in the process I tested with the test ZPM registry and it seemed to work fine...).

In any case I see (as I mentioned in my previous reply, it was worth looking there) that the UI Web Application was defined with an unauthenticated authentication method, only.

Even though the Module.xml file (link from previous version) defines it with Authentication...

Indeed when I look at the -verbose output of the ZPM install I see different behavior in each of the two CSP Apps being installed.

Even though both define this -

PasswordAuthEnabled="1"
UnauthenticatedEnabled="0"

For the REST app I see this:

Creating Web Application /pbuttons
    AutheEnabled: 32
    AuthenticationMethods:

Which is correct.

But for the 2nd app I see this:

Creating Web Application /pButtonsUI
    AuthenticationMethods:

Note no "AutheEnabled: 32" which it should have.

I edited some of the code within the ZPM class (%ZPM.PackageManager.Developer.Processor.CSPApplication) and saw that indeed the related properties (PasswordAuthEnabled & UnauthenticatedEnabled) where empty...

Playing around and comparing with some other module.xml's I found that perhaps the order of the values make a difference, so I changed:

<CSPApplication
  Url="/pButtonsUI"
  Path="/src/pButtonsAppCSP"
  Directory="{$cspdir}/pButtonsUI"
  PasswordAuthEnabled="1"
  UnauthenticatedEnabled="0"
  ServeFiles="1"
  Recurse="1"
  CookiePath="/pButtonsUI"
/>

to be:

<CSPApplication
  Url="/pButtonsUI"
  ServeFiles="1"
  Recurse="1"
  CookiePath="/pButtonsUI"
  UseCookies="2"
  PasswordAuthEnabled="1"
  UnauthenticatedEnabled="0"
  Path="/src/pButtonsAppCSP"
  Directory="{$cspdir}/pButtonsUI"
/>

And now when I run the zpm install I see thsi:

Creating Web Application /pButtonsUI
    AutheEnabled: 32
    AuthenticationMethods:

As expected.

So I pushed this update to github and hopefully this should work for you now.

In any case -

(a) I would recommend investigating why this was behavior - is this by design that the order of these attributes matter - if not - we should fix it,  and if yes - we should document it.

(b) and regarding documentation - I would recommend to document the actual attributes of this CSPApplication tag. In the current documentation there is a simple reference to the %Installer tags, but in reality though they are similar they are still different in some cases... so we should either indeed adhere to those, or document the ones that Module.xml actually uses.

For example, for relevance to the current discussion - the CSPApplication tag in our docs (referred to by the ZPM Module.xml docs) has an AuthenticationMethods attribute while the Module.xml has a combination of others instead.

Another example - Module.xml has a Path attribute and %Installer does not.

Let me know if this now works, and what you think about what I observed.

Thanks for trying Evgeny,

Regarding the error page you are getting in the UI I believe it's pointing you to the Application Error Log in the System Mgmt. Portal (right? the screenshot above is cut...), so try and look there and let me know what you find.

One place to verify things are generally setup ok for the web side, is to see the Web Application was created and defined correctly (including authentication, pointing to the correct physical folder, etc.).

Let me know what you find.

Regarding the Swagger/Open API spec - you find it in any of these -

1. A json file under the /swagger folder (as mentioned towards the end of the Readme). I used this for easier editing of the spec within VSCode with the relevant plugin.

2. The .spec class /src/zpButtons/REST/spec.cls

3. Using our built-in API Mgmt. REST API, in this case the URL would be, for example:

http://localhost:52773/api/mgmnt/v2/%25SYS/zpButtons.API.REST

With either of these you can take the JSON and view it via the Swagger Editor - https://editor.swagger.io/

Let me know if this is what you meant.

I believe the proper way to do this is not by editing the Production class XData, but rather by using the icon/button you can see in the image above, with the small light-blue arrow:

When hovering over this icon you can see the text: "Select settings defaults".

See details of how to use this here from the Docs.

In your case you would there check the checkbox fro the "try" setting, press the "Restore Defaults" button on the bottom of the dialog, and then press Apply on the Settings tab.

Regarding your question on the *.impl generated class -

if you already added code to this class and later update the swagger and consume it again - indeed the code you added will remain.

If you review the video recording of the Global Summit Solution Developer Conference session I mentioned above - you can see a live demonstration of this specific case. [I recommend you see all of it, but this particular part starts at about 33:30]

See also using the ^SECURITY utility (for manual export vs. programmatic which is possible via the Security package classes API).

For example:

 
%SYS>do ^SECURITY
 
 
1) User setup
2) Role setup
3) Service setup
4) Resource setup
5) Application setup
6) Auditing setup
7) Domain setup
8) SSL configuration setup
9) Mobile phone service provider setup
10) OpenAM Identity Services setup
11) Encryption key setup
12) System parameter setup
13) X509 User setup
15) Exit
 
Option? 2
 
1) Create role
2) Edit role
3) List roles
4) Detailed list roles
5) Delete role
6) Export roles
7) Import roles
8) Exit
 
Option? 6
 
Export which roles? * =>

If I understood the question correctly I think there might be some confusion...

Indeed internally Ensemble stores the Message Header times (TimeCreated & TimeProcessed) in a UTC time (per the considerations Robert mentioned) but when these times are displayed in the Message Viewer they go through conversion and are displayed in local time.

So if you would open the object via code, or run an SQL query directly, you would be dependent on running the relevant LogicalToDisplay() or LogicalToOdbc() methods for objects, or using the ODBC or Display runtime modes, but on the default Message Viewer web page these times should appear local.

You can examine this by doing a simple select on the Message Header table and you can see the difference between the Logical and Display modes.

For example, for a certain message, the Logical (internal UTC) time is 10:42 -

And now the same time using Display mode, the time is 13:42 -

And compare this with what you see in the Message Viewer, you see 13:42 -

and -

Note if you take a look at the Ens.DataType.UTC data-type class you can see it's conversion methods.

For example the LogicalToDisplay() method.

Here's an example of what it looks like when it's code runs.

In the following code I show my current local time (using $H, taking into account Time Zone and Daylight Saving), then I show the current general time (using $ZTS, per GMT and no Daylight Saving), and then applying the code run by the method, calling the method, and explicitly.

TEST>set currentLocalTime = $ZDateTime($Horolog,3,,3) 

TEST>set currentGeneralTime = $ZDateTime($ZTimeStamp,3,,3) 

TEST>write currentLocalTime
2018-09-20 10:46:07.000 

TEST>write currentGeneralTime 
2018-09-20 07:46:15.107 

TEST>write $zdatetime($zdTH($zdatetimeh(currentGeneralTime,3,,,,,,,,0),-3),3,,3) 
2018-09-20 10:46:15.107 

TEST>write ##class(Ens.DataType.UTC).LogicalToDisplay(currentGeneralTime) 
2018-09-20 10:46:15.107

See the -3 argument in the $ZDTH function call, from the docs this does the following -

$ZDATETIMEH takes a datetime value specified in $ZTIMESTAMP internal format, converts that value from UTC Universal time to local time, and returns the resulting value in the same internal format

Hi Dmitry,

Recommending your very cool and useful utility to someone I realized I did not find installation instructions, not here in this article, nor in the GitHub readme.

Could you please point me to them, or in case they indeed do not exist currently can you please provide them, for the benefit not only of the person I'm sharing this with, but with other Community members who will want to use this in the future. 

Tx!

What is the class name of your Web Service?

Is it also a Business Service? If so - what is the name of the BS component in the Production?

What URL are you using to access this WebService?

I have encountered this error when trying to call the WebService in a way that did not allow Ensemble to understand what is the name of the business service class it needs to use (for example by using the CfgItem URL parameter).

If I understand your question correctly then I think you'd benefit from defining and using a Search Table.

See from the Documentation -

If you need to query specifically via SQL (and not using the Message Viewer) then see also this answer (though relating to HL7, but relevant in the same way to the XML case) regarding using the Search Table within a query.

Please note that by default when a Persistent instance is %Saved()'d it gets done inside a Transaction, and therefore, even if the Database the Class' storage globals' are in, is not journaled, these SETs (and KILLs) will get journaled (for supporting rollback).

See this article for more details regarding avoiding journaling data. Specifically - the options of using CACHETEMP or turning off transactions for object filing.

Note if you are concerned with the audit logs generated for every turning off and on the journal for your process - you could simply turn off that System Audit event - %System/%System/JournalChange. Taking of course into consideration the drawback of not logging these kind of events outside the context of this specific scenario.

Hi Wolf,

I am using v2017.2.1 and Atelier 1.2.118 and I'm not experiencing this.

What I have encountered with regard to license consumption and Atelier (also with version 1.1 of Atelier) was that if I did not define a proper user for the server login (i.e. UnknownUser) then multiple users where consumed (per CSP session of the REST calls). So the recommendation is (also regardless of this licensing aspect) to define a real User for login. Note the phenomena I saw was that of multiple Users, not multiple connections of the same User (if that was what you were seeing).

I suggest that if, also when you define a proper User for login, the issue persists (and you don't get any other swift answer from the Community), you should work with the WRC to resolve this (and then hopefully post the answer back here on the Community).