go to post Ben Spead · Oct 18, 2019 David, I suggest you look into using the DeployToFile() and InstallFromFile() methods of the %Studio.Project class. A discussion of the topic can be found here in the docs: https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=ADEPLOY Another option is calling the following on individual classes: $system.OBJ.MakeClassDeployed() But since you are looking at just pushing partial updates, most likely the DeployToFile() with the parameter to strip out the source will be your best bet.
go to post Ben Spead · Sep 24, 2019 You can grab a Windows version of Caché 2018.1 from the WRC Distribution site and just install Studio out of there, or InterSystems IRIS Studio can also connect to earlier Caché versions, so you can grab a windows InterSystems IRIS Community kit from download.InterSystems.com and install Studio out of there.
go to post Ben Spead · Sep 13, 2019 Vikram ... for now, I suggest that you use the opportunity to try InterSystems IRIS for free hosted in a cloud container:https://www.intersystems.com/try-intersystems-iris-for-free/Keep your eyes open for an announcement during Global Summit about another way that you can get your hands on InterSystems IRIS for evaluation purposes.Thanks!Ben
go to post Ben Spead · Aug 9, 2019 I am assuming that when you are talking about 'folders' you mean the structure which individual items are exported into when you use your source control hooks, correct? To achieve this you need to loop over all items in the namespace and call the source-control related export on each of them.The way we do that for our internal systems is to the the BaselineExport() method in the %Studio.SourceControl.ISC class. %Studio.SourceControl.ISC is our source control hooks class for Perforce, and I haven't tried calling BaselineExport() while another set of hooks are configured for the namespace, it may *just work*, especially if your GitLab hooks use the ^Sources global to describe the export structure. Give is a try and let us know if it help (if not, I can get you the code for that method and you could adopt it for your purposes)
go to post Ben Spead · Jul 5, 2019 could you please give a little more of a description as to what you are hoping to accomplish? A JS file will be executed on the client, where-as "Caché Code" (by this I assume you mean Object Script?) is executed on the server.You can edit JS files using Studio, you can create object script class projections to automatically create JS files with JS logic in it, you can send JS from a server process to the web browser, etc - there are may ways for Caché Code to interact with, inform or manipulate JS files. We need more details for what you want to do.
go to post Ben Spead · Apr 8, 2019 If your machine is virtualized, just clone the VM (that is what we do for all of our test upgrades). NOTE - make sure to stand it up on an isolated network segment so that it doesn't try to do any inbound file processing or other communication that it should not (especially if you clone LIVE).
go to post Ben Spead · Mar 18, 2019 Bouncing off of @Robert.Cemper 's hints, if you are using a default SMP (system management portal) login you can just pass in the arguments for the username and password fields as follows:https://mytest.myserver.com/csp/sys/UtilHome.csp?CacheUserName=tech&CachePassword=demoI just tested this and it worked like a charm :) (use your own credentials of course)
go to post Ben Spead · Mar 6, 2019 Mike,We're using UnitTesting for application validation for internal application development within InterSystems. If you have any specific questions, feel free to create new Questions in the D.C. and tag me, or if you would prefer a general discussion you can ask your Account Manager or Sales Engineer to set up a discussion with me.There have also been several Global Summit presentations which have touched on the topic - not sure if you've seen these?Best,Ben SpeadManager, AppServices, InterSystems
go to post Ben Spead · Jan 18, 2019 I can only comment on the original functionality in %Studio.SourceControl.ISC - if you're extending it you will need to do some debugging to see exactly why you are seeing the behavior that you are.In the original %Studio.SourceControl.ISC class, when working in Connected mode (ie, Caché can issue p4 commands in real time to the Perforce server), the p4 command should take care of changing the file back to ReadOnly, which is what triggers GetStatus() to see it is uneditable and therefore not checked out. It may be that your GetStatus() isn't correctly interpretting the Reaonly state of the file, or if you are on UNIX, it may be that Caché doesn't see it properly as Readonly (this can happen if you are running your instance as Root). Note - I think there may be a bug where after checking the %Studio.SourceControl.Change table isn't updated appropriately, but the primary indicator of checked out/ checked in should be that Readonly bit on the file.Hopefully this is enough to get you moving on this, and if not then I suggest you call Support to have them take a look with you and debug. If there are any other questions I can answer in this forum I am happy to try.Best of luck!
go to post Ben Spead · Jan 17, 2019 Adrian - are you writing your own Perforce hooks or use the sample Perforce hooks that ship with Caché? (%Studio.SourceControl.ISC.cls).In %Studio.SourceControl.ISC.cls it checks to see if the file in the local workspace is Readonly or ReadWrite. If Readonly it assumes it is not checked out and prompts the user to check out. If ReadWrite it will see if it is a multi-developer or single-developer instance. if single developer it can just edit it. If multi-developer it will check in %Studio.SourceControl.Change to see if the current user is the one who checked it out - if so they can edit, if not they can a message of who is editing it in the Output window and the item is treated as ReadOnly to them.