Thanks for the info about the evolution of the LIST functions.

I'm just a developer without any insight information into the internals of LIST functions and, as you wrote, "The changes were carefully done so that working programs that use functions of the form $LISTxxx, $Lx, and $LxS to manipulate $LIST strings will not notice the changes.", hence I do not saw any changes.
OK, there were some enhancements like adding $LV() and $LU() or a third argument to $LTS(), but those changes are not relevant for existing applications.

Regarding the speed gain by using (JSON)array instead of (JSON)object, yes you have right, the array variant is about 5% faster. I just didn't made a speed test for the new solution, the goal was to have a "legal solution" and not an all-time record.

Finally, I'll ask you, why are things like the internal format of $BIT() or $LB() unpublished?
For example, $LB() can't be such a big mystery because a simple ZZDUMP reveals the structure?

There are cases where this information would be (very) helpful. Just to name one, I have a particular case. 

I wrote a simple class, which uses $ZF()-callouts, so the customer can create (i.e. export) data into an excel file (including formatting and colors) as well as read (i.e. import) data from an excel file (again, from *.xls and *.xlsx). The class has methods to read/write individual cells or whole rows or whole columns.

To pass row- and column-data between the application and the callout module, I use $LB().

set exl=##class(%Zu.Library.Excel).%New()
...
// writing data
do exl.WriteNum(row,col,value,format)
do exl.WriteRow(row,data) // data is $lb(col1, col2, ...colN)
// reading
set value=exl.ReadNum(row,col)
set data=exl.ReadRow(row)	// data is $lb(col1, col2, ...colN)
...

To be able to write the corresponding callout module (Windows-DLL as well as Linux-SO), the information about the $LB() structure were esential.
This is just one example. Similar solutions were used for the PDF- and ZIP-callout modules too.
At least for the $LB() it shouldn't be such a big secret, and an official documentation would certainly make more happy customers. But it is not my decision, it must be decided by ISC.

To get all the jobGUIDs you need two loops:

f i=1:1:list1.Size f j=1:1:list1.GetAt(i).sensors.Size w list1.GetAt(i).sensors.GetAt(j).jobGUID,!
0b955ee7-9a54-4b13-9af1-7019721faeab
8f9e85ab-31e7-4835-8969-6d72d142a2f1
68cea9d3-54cd-43f2-ae37-aaf47ed43e6b
7602764e-8951-451f-9653-ceb84834a1a6
88d2e472-a1e4-40b3-a108-f2d32a2023e5
116f2ac6-da5f-46da-a7c7-92d9eaf98c89
a878e527-f519-4aaa-bf5d-0d65f72de119
be570b14-0555-4b86-ab9f-e37c40c79216
3a13e243-d6ed-4788-98b2-52e9213bee00
54969869-c4f6-43f6-a74a-2a67f9a73fc5
700af7d3-77b3-4a84-ba11-ea49602d6558
18dc3370-c291-468b-af1f-0361d95bb02c
35d0d2e7-1199-4c18-8941-4fff6dbdba1f
8044560c-94d2-4da7-87f5-07328d9e62c1
b636a2f5-d35f-4c82-9646-e09572336e23
9c9a4bf4-e8af-4b8d-9de2-a99cdff150ed
a576d235-6eb6-4312-a1ff-7b1f767b88ce
654cf21e-daad-4a11-b676-86a7bc8a3360
2be4efc8-6616-4bff-87ba-30fe388a1b34
a5374d6c-311c-44d0-8d06-3a31f33dd3a8
955529c5-36be-4f3e-b768-0e3b377804a7
60a7cdb0-499e-4d02-b4d3-06ee58e40481
e84eda78-1491-49af-9e34-d647e817a251
9bcd5fe6-6f05-4482-ad78-612f35c60b41

I was told,  it's illegal to use data structure information, which doesn't were changed in the last 25 years (and after this many years, one could think to have the right given by "customary law" to use it), hence I decided for a more "legal" solution for the above problem - although this solution will work for IRIS (and recent Cache systems) only:

Class DC.Test Extends %RegisteredObject
{

/// Return TRUE if val contains a string
ClassMethod IsString2(val) As %Boolean
{
    quit {"a":(val)}.%GetTypeOf("a")="string"
}

/// Return TRUE if val contains a number (int, real or double)
ClassMethod IsNumber2(val) As %Boolean
{
    quit {"a":(val)}.%GetTypeOf("a")="number"
}

}

Oh, thanks for the hint, I'm aware of that. Actually one should remove the same characters as used in $locate():

if $locate($zstrip(data,"<w",",."), ...)

but the point is, to circumvent such problems, the rule number one in the electronic data processing is: you have to apply for check each and every input (at least) a formal check or you end up with problems like this. So the desired process should be:

read_data --> check_it --> proceed_if_OK_else_back_to_input

The same goes for data during an import process.

Try this one. The idea is, find the state (including the separators), everything before is the city and everything after is the zip code. Then we remove the separator chars (whitespaces, commas and dots).

ClassMethod Disjoin(data, cty, sta, zip)
{
    i $locate(data,"(\s|,|\.)[A-Za-z]{2}(\s|,|\.)",3,,sta) {
        s $lb(cty,zip)=$lfs(data,sta), sta=$$s(sta), cty=$$s(cty), zip=$$s(zip)
        
    } else { s (cty,sta,zip)="" }
    
    q sta]""
    
s(x)	q $zstrip(x,"<>w",",.")
}
Some examples
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("CANTON,TX.,75103",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> CANTON, TX, 75103
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("MILFORD, OH 45150",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> MILFORD, OH, 45150
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("MILFORD OH 45150",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> MILFORD, OH, 45150
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("KANSAS CITY MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> ST. LOUIS, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("  ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> ST. LOUIS, MO, 12345

OK, something like this gives a wrong result...
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("   ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> , ST, LOUIS MO, 12345

Class DC.Test Extends %RegisteredObject
{
/// Return TRUE if val contains an string
ClassMethod IsString(val) As %Boolean
{
    q $a($lb(val),2)<3
}
/// Return TRUE if val contains a number (int, real or double)
ClassMethod IsNumber(val) As %Boolean
{
    q $a($lb(val),2)>3
}
}

w ##class(DC.Test).IsString("abc") //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString("123") //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber("abc") //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber("123") //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123_345) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123+345) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123_456) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123+456) //--> 0

s x=123, y="123"
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(x) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(y) //--> 1

To help you, help us to help you. This means, show us what you have you already done. So we can you point in the right direction, maybe explain, why your solution dosn't work, etc. It's nothing bad to ask for help. At some point in the time we all were new to Studio and ObjecScript.

Just asking for a solution is like going home from the school and letting the parents make the homework...

So what have you tryed?

First, as you alread wrote, changing the collation of an already existing installation is dengerious,
second, as far as I know, the database creation page (of ManagementPortal) offers you "Cache/IRIS-standard" and "Cache/IRIS-standard string" only. Nevertheless, changing to "standard string" only affects the collation and not the display, i.e. string subscripts will be displayed quoted but numeric subscripts are not quoted.