To get all the jobGUIDs you need two loops:

f i=1:1:list1.Size f j=1:1:list1.GetAt(i).sensors.Size w list1.GetAt(i).sensors.GetAt(j).jobGUID,!
0b955ee7-9a54-4b13-9af1-7019721faeab
8f9e85ab-31e7-4835-8969-6d72d142a2f1
68cea9d3-54cd-43f2-ae37-aaf47ed43e6b
7602764e-8951-451f-9653-ceb84834a1a6
88d2e472-a1e4-40b3-a108-f2d32a2023e5
116f2ac6-da5f-46da-a7c7-92d9eaf98c89
a878e527-f519-4aaa-bf5d-0d65f72de119
be570b14-0555-4b86-ab9f-e37c40c79216
3a13e243-d6ed-4788-98b2-52e9213bee00
54969869-c4f6-43f6-a74a-2a67f9a73fc5
700af7d3-77b3-4a84-ba11-ea49602d6558
18dc3370-c291-468b-af1f-0361d95bb02c
35d0d2e7-1199-4c18-8941-4fff6dbdba1f
8044560c-94d2-4da7-87f5-07328d9e62c1
b636a2f5-d35f-4c82-9646-e09572336e23
9c9a4bf4-e8af-4b8d-9de2-a99cdff150ed
a576d235-6eb6-4312-a1ff-7b1f767b88ce
654cf21e-daad-4a11-b676-86a7bc8a3360
2be4efc8-6616-4bff-87ba-30fe388a1b34
a5374d6c-311c-44d0-8d06-3a31f33dd3a8
955529c5-36be-4f3e-b768-0e3b377804a7
60a7cdb0-499e-4d02-b4d3-06ee58e40481
e84eda78-1491-49af-9e34-d647e817a251
9bcd5fe6-6f05-4482-ad78-612f35c60b41

Try this one. The idea is, find the state (including the separators), everything before is the city and everything after is the zip code. Then we remove the separator chars (whitespaces, commas and dots).

ClassMethod Disjoin(data, cty, sta, zip)
{
    i $locate(data,"(\s|,|\.)[A-Za-z]{2}(\s|,|\.)",3,,sta) {
        s $lb(cty,zip)=$lfs(data,sta), sta=$$s(sta), cty=$$s(cty), zip=$$s(zip)
        
    } else { s (cty,sta,zip)="" }
    
    q sta]""
    
s(x)	q $zstrip(x,"<>w",",.")
}
Some examples
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("CANTON,TX.,75103",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> CANTON, TX, 75103
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("MILFORD, OH 45150",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> MILFORD, OH, 45150
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("MILFORD OH 45150",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> MILFORD, OH, 45150
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("KANSAS CITY MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> KANSAS CITY, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> ST. LOUIS, MO, 12345
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("  ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> ST. LOUIS, MO, 12345

OK, something like this gives a wrong result...
i ##class(DC.Test).Disjoin("   ST. LOUIS MO, 12345",.c,.s,.z) w c,", ",s,", ",z --> , ST, LOUIS MO, 12345

Class DC.Test Extends %RegisteredObject
{
/// Return TRUE if val contains an string
ClassMethod IsString(val) As %Boolean
{
    q $a($lb(val),2)<3
}
/// Return TRUE if val contains a number (int, real or double)
ClassMethod IsNumber(val) As %Boolean
{
    q $a($lb(val),2)>3
}
}

w ##class(DC.Test).IsString("abc") //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString("123") //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber("abc") //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber("123") //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123_345) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsNumber(123+345) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123_456) //--> 1
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(123+456) //--> 0

s x=123, y="123"
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(x) //--> 0
w ##class(DC.Test).IsString(y) //--> 1

I'm quite shure, the above code won't work as expected, or with the words of Joseph Weizenbaum: “A computer will do what you tell it to do, but that may be much different from what you had in mind.”

The content of your myf variable is always 0 (the result of comparing nullstring with a filename), the size of tmpFile stream is also 0 (you never write into the stream).

Sometimes it's faster to write a "oneliner" to solve a simple problem then searching and downloading a solution from openexchange or from whereever... That's the beauty of the ObjectScript.

And if you think, the oneliner is worth to be reused, then make it to a method, add some small adjustments for a general usability...

The oneliner

s str="",tmp=##class(%File).TempFilename("txt") o tmp:"NWRU":0 i $t { u tmp zw ^||fruit s s=$zpos r:'$zseek(0) str#s c tmp:"D" }

The more general version

ClassMethod ToString(ref,max=32000)
{
    s tmp=##class(%File).TempFilename("txt") o tmp:"NWRU":0 q:'$t ""
    u tmp zw @ref s siz=$zpos r:'$zseek(0) str#$s(siz>max:max,1:siz) c tmp:"D" q str
}

Use it as

write ##(your.class).ToString($na(^||fruit))


The simplest way is to create a classmethod, which returns the desired name:

Class DC.Evgenys.Data Extends %Persistent
{
/// which: 0=Fullname, 1=Schemaname, 2=Tablename
ClassMethod TableName(which = 0) [ CodeMode = objectgenerator ]
{
    set sch=%compiledclass.SqlSchemaName, tab=%compiledclass.SqlTableName
    do %code.WriteLine($c(9)_"quit $p("""_sch_"."_tab_","_sch_","_tab_""","","",which+1)")
    quit $$$OK
}
}

So you can do something like this:

for i=0:1:2 write ##class(DC.Evgenys.Data).TableName(i),!
DC_Evgenys.Data
DC_Evgenys
Data

A possible work-around could be the class below. In short, you work with your json property as intended, merely before saving the object, you save the json-property into a stream and after opening an instance, you restore the json-property from the the stream - that's all. The drawback, no SQL over the json property...

Class DC.Dyn Extends %Persistent
{
Property json As %DynamicObject [ Transient ];
Property jstr As %GlobalCharacterStream [ Internal, Private ];

ClassMethod MyTest(kill = 0)
{
   if kill do ..%KillExtent(1,1)

   set obj=..%New()
   set obj.json.short="A short test text"
   set obj.json.maxstr=$tr($j("",$$$MaxStringLength)," ","X")
   do obj.json.%Set("hugedata",..stream(obj),"stream")

   write "Status : ",obj.%Save(),!
   set id=obj.%Id()
   write "ID : ",id,!
   kill (id)

   set obj=..%OpenId(id)
   write "short : ",obj.json.short,!
   write "maxstr : ",$e(obj.json.maxstr,1,20),"... Size: ",$length(obj.json.maxstr),!
   set stream=obj.json.%Get("hugedata",,"stream")
   write "hugedata: ",stream.Read(20),"... Size: ",stream.Size,!
}

ClassMethod stream(obj)
{
   set stream=##class(%Stream.TmpCharacter).%New()
   do stream.Write(obj.json.short)
   do stream.Write(obj.json.maxstr)
   do stream.Write(obj.json.maxstr)
   quit stream
}

Method %OnOpen() As %Status [ Private, ServerOnly = 1 ]
{
   if ..jstr {
      do ..jstr.Rewind()
      set ..json=##class(%DynamicAbstractObject).%FromJSON(..jstr)
   }
   Quit $$$OK
}

Method %OnAddToSaveSet(depth As %Integer = 3, insert As %Integer = 0, callcount As %Integer = 0) As %Status [ Private, ServerOnly = 1 ]
{
   do ..jstr.Clear(), ..json.%ToJSON(..jstr)
   Quit $$$OK
}
}

Some testing...

IDEV:USER>d ##class(DC.Dyn).MyTest(1)
Status  : 1
ID      : 1
short   : A short test text
maxstr  : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX... Size: 3641144
hugedata: A short test textXXX... Size: 7282305

If your code uses obj.%Reload() then %OnReload() and %OnOpen() should contain the same code.

Your solution is just perfect. And fast.

But yes, you can avoid string manipulations... This one, for example, uses math only, merely it's neither short nor looks elegant:

 set dt=$h write $zd(dt,8)*100+($p(dt,",",2)\3600)*100+($p(dt,",",2)#3600\60)*100+($p(dt,",",2)#60)

but gives the same result as your short and nice solution...

 set dt=$h write $zd(dt,8)*100+($p(dt,",",2)\3600)*100+($p(dt,",",2)#3600\60)*100+($p(dt,",",2)#60),!,$tr($zdt(dt,8)," :")

On the other hand, you can install new brakes on your car, as suggested by others... ;-))

Just compare those codes with yours:

set h=$h, t=$zh for i=1:1:1E6 { set x=$tr($system.SQL.TOCHAR($h,"YYYY^MM^DD^HH24^MI^SS"),"^") } write $zh-t,!

set h=$h, t=$zh for i=1:1:1E6 { set x=$tr($zdt(h,8)," :") } write $zh-t,!

The choice is yours...

Just to put things in right perspektive, those "one letter commands" and "a lot of them in the same line" were neither tempting nor addictive, they were simply necessity!

At the time of the birth of MUMPS (the core of Cache/IRIS/etc.), more then 50 years ago in the second half of 1960es,  memory (which was a real core memory at the time) was rare and expensive and was measured in units of kilobytes! Just to contrast, today's server have the same amount of RAM, but in gigabytes, that's a factor of one million!

As a consequence of memory shortage and because MUMPS of that time was interpreted (i.e. you loaded the sourcecode into memory), one had to utilize each and every possibility to save memory. One of those possibilities were the ability of the language to short each command to one letter and to put as many commads as possible into one line (thereby saving line-ending bytes).

The tools (to save memory) of that (ancient) time were argumentless IFs and ELSES, short (variable-, global- and routine) names, commands with postcondition and sophisticated programming.

Last but not least, if one aims to "modernize" thos old applications, should be keept in mind, especially, if one is not so familiar with the old fashioned style and methods, there will be many unexpected pitfalls.

Sample1: on old printers, the line with "Total..." will be printed "bold-alike"

 write "last item",?15,$j($fn(val,",",2),10),!
 write ?15,"----------",! do  do  do
 . write $c(13),"Total",?15,$j($fn(sum,",",2),10)
 write !!!,"Due date for payment ....",!

Sample2: converting from:

 ; normal flow
 do
 . ; nested
 . ; commands
 ; normal flow

into:

 ; normal flow
 if 1 {
   ; nestd
   ; commands
 }
 ; normal flow

will be in most cases OK, except, if the nested part uses the current value of $STACK:
this is now one less then in case of argumentless DO!