Are you trying for the Cache driver, or the IRIS driver? I'm pretty sure the 3.0.0 jar you're using is an IRIS driver, and in that case, the driver is com.intersystems.jdbc.IRISDriver, not com.intersys.jdbc.CacheDriver (note that in that transition, the beginning of the package changed from com.intersys to com.intersystems.)

I've never done that, but if you add it as a menu item, can you then go to View -> Toolbars -> Customize and find it in the commands tab? And if so, can you drag it to the toolbar you want it on from there?

Depending on your needs, you might consider creating a class that extends both %Net.HttpRequest and %JSON.Adaptor and using the %JSON.Adaptor methods to create a JSON representation of the instance. That would be easier to analyze.

Your result.HttpResponse.Data can be either a string or a stream object. If it's a stream object you'll have to handle it a little bit differently using result.HttpResponse.Data.Read():

set response=result.HttpResponse.Data.Read()
while 'result.HttpResponse.Data.AtEnd{
    set response = response_result.HttpResponse.Data.Read()
}

You can also open your log4j.jar as you would a zip file, go to the META-INF folder, open MANIFEST.MF and look for "Implementation-Version" to see which version of log4j it is.

In your class definition, if you wanted a maximum length of 1000 as an example, you would define your string as:

Property mystring As %String (MAXLEN = 1000);

But as Robert has already pointed out, if you're dealing with something very large, it's better to use some sort of %Stream instead.

If I try to replicate some of these steps in my instance of Cache 2016, I get an error at:

Set httpRequest.Https = $$$YES

Does it make a difference if you try:

Set httpRequest.Https = 1

In that case, does it meet your needs to make it a list of %String instead of making a separate class?

When you're projecting a list of a class to XML, you usually have a parent element for each of those objects, then a separate element for each of it's properties. So I think what you'd need to do would be something more like:

<Results>
    <PersonIDs>
        <PersonID>
            <PersonID>1000000</PersonID>
        </PersonID>
        <PersonID>  
            <PersonID>1000001</PersonID>
        </PersonID>  
        <PersonID>  
            <PersonID>1000005</PersonID>
        </PersonID>  
    </PersonIDs> 
</Results>

So that the outer PersonID element indicates your PersonID object, and the PersonID inside of that is the PersonID property of that object.

Jacquie, I did that a couple of weeks ago, but the challenge is still "pending" even though the review was published by Gartner. How long should we expect it to take to get approved?

Here's a possible alternative to using SqlComputeCode.

You can override the getter method for that property so that it always returns the related document name. In your Question class, define your docFileName property as:

Property docFileName As %String [ReadOnly];

You'll want it to be read only because you aren't going to want to be able to set this property in the question object. You're going to want to retrieve it from the document object. If it could also be set here, you'd have things weirdly out of sync. Then, in that same class, include the following method:

Method docFileNameGet() As %String{
    if ..Document '= ""{
        return ..Document.FileName
    }
    else{
        return ""
    }
}

Once you do that, whenever you refer to the question's docFileName, it'll give you the document's file name, or an empty string if there isn't one.

I don't think you can reference relationships in SqlComputeCode, so I'm not sure how you'd do this. But out of curiosity, why have a calculated field in the question class rather than just referring to it as Document.FileName (or Document->FileName in SQL)?

Gary, if you want to put something into the Cache Task Manager, you have to create a class that extends %SYS.Task.Definition and put the OnTask method there.

I wrote a how-to on using the task manager after you posted this. It might help you.