I believe the privilege comes from the OS user that is launching Terminal.

Have you tried running Terminal as an Admin and seeing if runs as expected?

Hey Kurro.

You should be able to include the allowed source in the rule constraint:

Alternatively, you could add a rule above that looks like this:

Hey Nicola.

Changing the theme can certainly make Studio a little easier on the eyes (although it does feel like a bit of a hack): https://github.com/doublefint/CacheColorTheme

Hey Kurro.

To access values from your message class, you will need to alter your references to your class in your if statements.

For example, rather than just calling "CodigoProveedor", you will need to state "Document.CodigoProveedor" so that the router is looking for "CodigoProveedor" within the document received by the router.

You can test this by adding a new "When" within your Rule and use the expression editor to start type "Document.Cod" and this should then start giving you autocomplete options. For example:

As an aside (and because it's caught me out a few times) if your router is working with just custom classes and not HL7, do make sure your router is a General message router and not a HL7 message router as this can sometimes lead to odd errors.

Hey Yone.

Assuming you're only using ObjectScript for this, then way to achieve this would be to take your HL7 as Enslib.HL7.Message, and then loop through the segments to pull out the PID segment, and then loop through PID:3 for a match.

For example:

//loop through HL7 and find PID Segment
set SegCount = request.SegCount
for i=1:1:SegCount{
    set segment = request.GetSegmentAt(i)
    if (segment.Name="PID"){
        //Loop through PID:3
        set numCnt = segment.GetValueAt("3(*)")
        for j=1:1:numCnt{
            set P341=segment.GetValueAt("3("_j_").4.1")
            set P5=segment.GetValueAt("3("_j_").5")
            if (P341="CAC")&&(P5="JHN") {
                $$$TRACE("Match found!")
                }
        }
    }
}

Alternatively, you could create a DTL with the logic which you can from the ObjectScript, and then have the target in your DTL be something like a string container that you can then grab a result from. However that might be a bit clunky depending on your use case.

Hey Rochdi.

The issue here is that you can't use the Arrow within the ON Clause and the alternative here would be to use ANSI Join syntax.

If it helps, the documentation (under Join Definitions) states that -> performs a left outer join? There's also a section further down for ON Clause if that is useful in any way.

Hey Eduard.

For question 3 - you could technically group them using managed alerts, as there is a function you can include in the router that is supposed to not raise an alert but instead update an existing managed alert (IsRecentManagedAlert) but this would mean getting alerted on the first message.

However, I have found this to be a bit inconsistent as it relies on a match on the AlertText and SourceConfigName within a user defined timeframe. Where this catches me out is when the alert text contains something like a timestamp, as this makes it unique so a new alert is raised anyway.

Alternatively, you could create a function that writes the alerts to an internal table, and then poll that table every x minutes to generate a single detailed alert message?

Hey Muhammad.

When you say validation, what exactly do you mean?

If you are interested in making sure it matches the format of ICD-10-AM codes, then you could use pattern matching to ensure it fits the expected format. At first glance, it looks to be 1 Letter + 2 Numbers + 1 period + 1 or 2 numbers. The pattern match for this would be "1A2N1"."1.2N"

For example:

USER> Set ICD10 = "K76.3"
USER> If ICD10?1A2N1"."1.2N {Write "This is ICD10"} else {write "This is not ICD10"}
This is ICD10

If you are looking to actually make sure the code is a real ICD10 code, then you would need to be able to query a data source that contains a full list of valid codes. If this is the direction you're looking to go in, then you may want to look into FHIR based terminology services to be able to query your codes against to see if they're valid? But I'm not familiar with the practicality or cost of something like that.

(ps - I have linked to the temporary documentation, however I'm not sure how long that will exist)