Hello,

We had a weird behavior of task manager in mirror async backup-failover pair:

1. server 1 was primary, server 2 backup for over a month, as there was no automatic failover (switch) both had IRIS up for over a month
2. We manually switched making server 2 primary
3. The tasks that had this issue were set to "run on Primary only"
4. Task manager started to execute tasks every minute: we noticed that "Next scheduled time" is always calculated in past date, and progressing by the task interval (e.g. a task that supposed to run every hour will have "Next scheduled time" in the past e.g.

Overview

We started to use Azure Service Bus (ASB) as an enterprise messaging solution 3 years ago. It is being used to publish and consume data between many applications in the organization. Since the data flow is complex, and one application’s data is usually needed in multi applications the “publisher” ---> ”multiple subscribers” model was a great fit. The ASB usage in the organization is dozens of millions of messages per day, while IRIS platform is having around 2-3 million messages/day.

Hello guys,

Does anyone know what is a process status IPQW ?

We get it in jobs that do some SQL..

Thanks in advance.

Yaron Munz 

Hello, 

We have a simple BS that Extends Ens.BusinessService with an ADAPTER = "EnsLib.File.InboundAdapter";
The "incoming" folder has more than 4M files, so we get the following error:
ERREUR <Ens>ErrException: <STORE>zFileSetExecute+38 ^%Library.File.1

Is there any simple workaround this ?

Hello,

Is there an elegant way to define a dynamic "Archive path" for EnsLib.File.InboundAdapter ?

What i mean is to have a sub-folders structure (under the root archive path) with a name similar to: yyyymmdd
This way the adapter "could" store the files on those sub-folders (and create a new one for the 1st file for a specific date).

When a production is processing hundreds of thousands of files every day, we might end up with an archive with huge number of files (many millions) which is then hard to handle (read, search) especially on Windows O/S.

In a Business Process (BPL) I noticed that if I 'm using a "scope" to handle errors  then inside the "scope" when a "call" is used, the "request" and "response" action (i.e set for callrequest.prop = request.prop & response.prop = callrespones.prop does NOT work !
The result is that the values of those properties in the callrequest  are nulls (I do see the properties names in the content of the callrequest message)

What is the best way to solve this issue ?
As it seems that there are new instances of the request/response objects inside the scope, whats the best way to pass them into the scope ?