Some comments on code.

  • rename fileToImport to mysqldumpFile
  • remove 2 references to other classes

 

That said, it does not work on my sql script on the table creation part, despite throwing no errors (data insert throws an error -  Table not found, but previous  statement which creates the table seems to run okay, but the table does not get created)

 

UPD: Reread your post, only INSERT, ok.

Graphs (and measurements in a method) include conversion times.

>$find

I tried this:

$$$START("Using $find (hardcoded delimiter): ")
For i=1:1:pIterations {
    Set tPosition = 0
    Do {
        Set tNewPosition = $Find(tString,",",tPosition)
        Set tValue = $Select(tNewPosition'=0:$Extract(tString,tPosition,tNewPosition-2),1:$Extract(tString,tPosition,*))
        Set tPosition = tNewPosition
    } While tPosition '= 0
}
$$$END

It was slow. Is there any way to write this faster - eg. without select (or other condition for the last piece)?

> Pros/Cons for multiple simple deployments vs single more complex deployment)

If you have a virtualization platform and clients are heavy users, it would probably make a lot of sense to go with multiple simple deployments, and if you'll have many clients who can't load a single smallest node then "single complex"  would be better.

Developing "lots of simple" system (so 1 simple system with multiple deploys) would be cheaper (as you don't have tyo think about domains and security would be simpler, maybe some other simplifications would be possible), but hosting would (maybe) be more expensive as there is a lot of overhead in resources (to run OS/Cache for each deploy).

As I understand, you need Caché users + some way to:

  • Store additional information
  • Provide methods for web-login-account management
  • Provide additional security checks

I guess domains could be used, okay. Also, here's somewhat related thread.

>And if so, when deploying updates to the applications, would each domain/user-pool context be replicated environments

> that would each need to be updated?

Why? You have production server with real users and a test one(s) with some test users.

One approach would be to use %XML.DataSet to convert SQL results into XML:

Set result=##class(%XML.DataSet).%New()                                  
Do result.Prepare("SELECT TOP 3 ID, Name FROM Sample.Person")
Do result.Execute()                                                      1
Do result.WriteXML("root",,,,,1) 

Outputs:

<root>
<s:schema id="DefaultDataSet" xmlns="" attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:msdata="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata">
  <s:element name="DefaultDataSet" msdata:IsDataSet="true">
    <s:complexType>
      <s:choice maxOccurs="unbounded">
        <s:element name="SQL">
          <s:complexType>
            <s:sequence>
              <s:element name="ID" type="s:long" minOccurs="0" />
              <s:element name="Name" type="s:string" minOccurs="0" />
            </s:sequence>
          </s:complexType>
        </s:element>
      </s:choice>
    </s:complexType>
    <s:unique name="Constraint1" msdata:PrimaryKey="true">
      <s:selector xpath=".//SQL" />
      <s:field xpath="ID" />
    </s:unique>
  </s:element>
</s:schema>
<diffgr:diffgram xmlns:msdata="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata" xmlns:diffgr="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-diffgram-v1">
<DefaultDataSet xmlns="">
  <SQL diffgr:id="SQL1" msdata:rowOrder="0">
    <ID>96</ID>
    <Name>Adam,Wolfgang F.</Name>
  </SQL>
  <SQL diffgr:id="SQL2" msdata:rowOrder="1">
    <ID>188</ID>
    <Name>Adams,Phil H.</Name>
  </SQL>
  <SQL diffgr:id="SQL3" msdata:rowOrder="2">
    <ID>84</ID>
    <Name>Ahmed,Edward V.</Name>
  </SQL>
</DefaultDataSet>
</diffgr:diffgram>
</root>

There is also %SQL.Export.Mgr class, which does SQL export.

Thanks!

I often need to run queries from a terminal, so I extended Caché ObjectScript with zsql command to run queries and display the results. Here's how it works:

 zsql "SELECT TOP 2 Name FROM Sample.Person"

Would output:

Name
Adams,Chris Z.
Adams,Danielle P

To achieve it I created %ZLANGC00 mac routine with the following code:

 ; %ZLANGC00
 ; custom commands for ObjectScript
 ; http://docs.intersystems.com/cache20141/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls?KEY=GSTU_customize
  Quit  

/// Execute Query and display the results
/// Call like this:
/// zsql "SELECT TOP 10 Name FROM Sample.Person"
ZSQL(Query)
  #Dim ResultSet As %SQL.StatementResult
  Set ResultSet = ##class(%SQL.Statement).%ExecDirect(, Query)
  Do ResultSet.%Display()
  Quit

Save and compile it and then you can execute sql (class queries too) in a terminal with zsql command:

zsql "SELECT * FROM Sample.SP_Sample_By_Name('Z')"

That said I myself prefer executing SQL queries in SMP because you don't need to type them there (drag&drop from the left panel or copy&paste from the code) - it's very convenient.

Since project is a collection of classes (and other items, yes, but we're talking about classes here) the  flow would be something like that:

  • Get project name
  • Project name to class list
  • Get unit tests for class list
  • Run unit tests

I'm just saying that 3rd step can have more callers (alternative routes to 3rd step if you will), for example:

  • Package to class list
  • Wildcard expression to class list
  • Namespace to class list