go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 24, 2019 Nice feature to have.One note about the code: if you have a BO that accepts only one type of messages, you can (I myself prefer to - as it immediately notifies the reader that this BO works with only one type of messages, and not just a small BO in development) remove Message map altogether and define an OnRequest method, which would process these messages. Pull request.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 22, 2019 You use 8bit Caché. Maybe you need to convert GraphQL.xml into your local encoding.Or use Unicode Caché.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 21, 2019 If you want, you can pass current IP as a header or inside the message body.Do you want it for logging purposes, such as what actions were performed from which IP?
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 21, 2019 My go-to https redirect: RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^ https://%{SERVER_NAME}%{REQUEST_URI} [END,QSA,R=permanent]
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 21, 2019 Strange, as that should not be hit for AbstractREST at all.Does you class looks the same as in repo?Just compiled successfully on: Cache for Windows (x86-64) 2017.2 (Build 744U) Fri Sep 29 2017 10:58:27 EDT
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 21, 2019 Looks like NAT. Cloud server only sees external address (214.17.17) as it should.Why do you want to get internal address?
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 20, 2019 Try installing httpd from the package manager for your OS..Add http to https redirect.Maybe plugins go to https first, so redirect all traffic to https. Good for various cached links, etc.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 18, 2019 If someone is interested, here's the same code but as a class: /// Utility to match input against comma-separated string of masks. Class util.Matcher { /// Returns $$$YES if input matches at least one element from the list /// input - string to match /// list - comma separated list of masks containig * and ? /// write ##class(util.Matcher).MatchOr() ClassMethod MatchOr(input As %String, list As %String) As %Boolean { set ok = $$$NO for pie=1:1:$L(list,",") { set mask=$P(list,",",pie) if mask'="",..Match(input,mask) { set ok = $$$YES } } quit ok } /// Returns $$$YES if input matches all elements from the list /// input - string to match /// list - comma separated list of masks containig * and ? /// write ##class(util.Matcher).MatchAnd() ClassMethod MatchAnd(input As %String, list As %String) As %Boolean { set ok = $$$YES for pie=1:1:$L(list,",") { set mask=$P(list,",",pie) if mask'="",'..Match(input,mask) { set ok = $$$NO } } quit ok } /// Returns $$$YES if input matches the mask /// write ##class(util.Matcher).Match() ClassMethod Match(input As %String, mask As %String) As %Boolean [ CodeMode = expression ] { input?@..MaskToPattern(mask) } /// Translate mask into a pattern /// write ##class(util.Matcher).MaskToPattern() ClassMethod MaskToPattern(mask As %String) As %String { set pattern = "" set char = "" for pos = 1:1:$length(mask) { set curChar = $extract(mask, pos) if curChar = "*" { set pattern = pattern _ $select(char="":"", 1:"1"""_char_"""") _ ".E" set char = "" } elseif curChar = "?" { set pattern = pattern _ $select(char="":"", 1:"1"""_char_"""") _ "1E" set char = "" } else { set char = char _ curChar } } set pattern = pattern _ $select(char="":"", 1:"1"""_char_"""") quit pattern } }
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 18, 2019 You can store salt in the same table, it should just be unique (autogenerated) for each password.There's a good explanation why that's enough, here.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 16, 2019 Do not store passwords.Store password hashes + Unique salt. When entered hashCheck $system.Encryption class for various hashing algorithms.The only case where you need to store passwords is when they are used to authenticate Cache server against external systems.In that case use the same $system.Encryption class to encrypt them for storage.we're talking of 200-300+ passwords here.Per user?
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 16, 2019 Is the "bi login" hosted on the same Cache server?If so you'll need to add /dsw and /mdx2json to the same group/same cookie path as your app and you should be all set.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 12, 2019 You could (and probably should) separate these parts of routines as separate methods or at least subroutines.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 12, 2019 And if you don't have labels, adding them wouldn't break existing code.For example you have this routine: TEST write 1 write 2 write 3 quit It, when called would output >do ^TEST 123 If you then add a label somewhere: TEST write 1 MYLABEL write 2 write 3 quit The routine would wok the same on previous calls: >do ^TEST 123 But you'll also be able to call only the label: >do MYLABEL^TEST 23
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 11, 2019 Can you ballpark the workload?If it's not too big, I think the easiest solution would be just writing ObjectScript method that calculates what you need.
go to post Eduard Lebedyuk · Jan 10, 2019 tFullValue should be always equal to tNumber regardless of tNumber value. write $l(2.1) >3