Nigel Salm · Mar 16, 2021

Calling class methods of a class in another Namespace


I have a class in several namespaces. This class is what I call a common component in that it is a class that performs a certain set of functions that are common to a number of Interfaces. In this example the class is essentially a Message Queue. When a Data Event is created in my source database I want to invoke the CreateMessage() class method in all of Interface namespaces.

The common component class has a name DFI.Common.Queue.ODSMessageQueue. I can inherit the class into one or more classes e.g. DFI.Common.Queue.Interface1MessageQueue, DFI.Common.Queue.Interface2MessageQueue.

In my Data Source Namespace I have a class that has the following properties:

  • InterfaceName
  • InterfaceNamespace
  • MessageQueueClassName
  • IsActive
  • IsLiveProduction

So there is a record for each interface, the namespace it is running in and the MessageQueueClassName which is either DFI.Common.Queue.ODSMessageQueue or if I use inheritance then the class names will be the inherited class name in that Interface Namespace.

So when a data event occurs in my Data Source Namespace then I will create a message in every message queue. So I walk through each record in my list of interfaces and using the MessageQueueClassName I can do the following:

set tSC=$classmethod(MessageQueueClassName,"CreateMessage",Param1,Param2,...ParamN)

So there are two possible approaches:

1) I put the DFI.Common.Queue.ODSMessageQueue class into the Data Source Namespace and then I create a class mapping into each Interface namespace but I do not create a global mapping. This will ensure that the code is available in the Interface Namespace but it will store the underlying global in the Interface Namespace.

2) If I use inherited class names that are specific to each Interface then the mapping is reversed. The class is mapped to the Data Source Namespace. If I map the global to the Data Source Namespace then as long as class names are different there is no issue. But if I have Interface QC Namespace and a Production Interface Namespace that use the same MessageQueueClassName then the data from the one namespace will be written into the same global as the second namespace. To compensate for this I could build the Primary Key/IDkey on the class as being The InterfaceName, Namespace, Generated Integer ID.

e.g. ^DFI.Common.Queue.Interface1MessageQueue({nterfaceName},{Namespace},RowId)={$lb(message properties})

I don't like this as I would rather have a system RowId so that I am not constrained from using Bitmap Indexing. I also have heve very long ID's in the form:


So, at this point I have a couple of different approaches that use Class and Global Mapping.

So my question is:

From my Data Source Namespace can I call the methods in my Message Queue Classes which reside in each Interface Namespace without using mappings and without using namespace swapping. By that I mean:

set currentNS=$namespace

zn InterfaceNamespace

set tSC=##class(.....).CreateMessage(p1,p2,...,pN)

In the Interface Namespace I have a Business Service, DFI.Common.Service.MessageQueueService, which calls a method GetNextMessage()

The message class has the following groups of properties:

The Timestamps




The Data Fields

These are the fields of data that I want to send to my Interface which will use the information in these fields to generate either an HL7 PIX/PDQ Message or a FHIR Resource JSON. These properties would be specific to ypur data source and the information that is required by the Interface.

The Status Fields

The Document Type,

Message Status,

HTTP/FILE/SQL Response Status

HTTP Response Body JSON or HL7

Human Readable Error Message

The Process

The GetNextMessage() finds the next message where ProcessTS and CompletedTS are NULL

Having found a message set the ProcessTS to %TimeStamp

Create a Request Message to send to the Business Process that has one property: MessageID

Process the message in the Business Process, access the required data, transform it into the target document type

Despatch to the Business Operation (HTTP, File (for testing purposes))

Receive a Response

Call the CompleteMessage() Method that updates the status fields

Job Done

Other Methods

Purge Message Queue older than N days

Resend Messages (sets the processTS and CompletedTS and Status fields to NULL, thereby restoring the message to unsent)

I give you thi imformation because I have a question about it in the Poll Section



If I receive a satisfactory answer, even if it is based on mapping rather than cross namespace method calls....

Register or login to poll

Is this a good Issue/Topic?
If you had to choose between the three options which one would you choose?
Do you think I should publish this in Open Exchange?
Would you like to find out about other common Utilities of mine that are designed to create Interfaces quickly?to
$ZV: IRIS for Windows (x86-64) 2020.1 (Build 217.1U) Wed May 27 2020 14:28:49 EDT
Product version:
IRIS 2020.2
1 0 5 120
Log in or sign up to continue


2 remarks:

  • mapping your class to pseudo_namespace %ALL makes it available to all other namespaces except %SYS
  • to keep your options for a bitmap valid you may take the approach shown in my article of the Adopted Bitmap    The default of a storage global is ^Pck.ClassnameD .. and so on. But it can also be  ^Pck.ClassnameD(%InterfaceName,$namespace)  and the integer ID follows as you need. You just have to take care that %InterfaceName has some useful content.  Which shouldn't be a problem. I used %name to bypass all issues with ProcedureBlock.  

Hi Robert

I noticed your Adopted Bitmap post but didn't read it, but i shall do so now.

If it works for me I will factor it into my code and test and if I like it I will flag you answer as accepted unless someone manages to come p with a way of calling a classmethod in another namespace. I suspect it is not possible as there are issues such as where the objects would be instantiated and whether the source namespace would be able to access them and I suspect cocurrrency could be an issue if you are creating objects in the same class but in different namespaces. It would be a nightmare to keep track of who has which objects open.


Just adding 2c:

  • mapping your class to pseudo_namespace %ALL makes it available to all other namespaces except %SYS would be available to all namespaces including %SYS.

You are right. I mixed it up with some other  ALL   ["CompileAll" ?]

How about a slightly different architecture:

  1. Create a table, visible in all namespaces called Requests - and from Data Source namespace add 1 row to it on every new message.
  2. Create a table, visible in all namespaces called Ack which contains {RequestId, Namespace, State}
  3. In each namespace create a Business Service which would:
    1. Poll Requests/Ack tables to get new unprocessed requests (no corresponding Ack record).
    2. If an unprocessed request is found create an Ack record and send a message in a local namespace for BP processing
    3. Maybe write a response after the message is processed (or do it in BP/ProxyBP/job)

Advantage of this architecture is that you decouple processing on a namespace level - so if a production in one namespace is in error state/down the rest can proceed. It also eliminates a single point of failure in namespace switching job.

tl;dr instead of pushing your event make consumers pull it whenever convenient.