I think projecting as an attribute is enough. Here's an example:

Class Utils.Message Extends (%RegisteredObject, %XML.Adaptor)
{

Parameter XMLNAME = "ID";

Property scope As %String(XMLPROJECTION = "ATTRIBUTE");

}

DTL:

Class Utils.DTL Extends Ens.DataTransformDTL
{

XData DTL [ XMLNamespace = "http://www.intersystems.com/dtl" ]
{
<transform sourceClass='Ens.Request' targetClass='Utils.Message' create='new' language='objectscript' >
<assign value='"Message"' property='target.scope' action='set' />
</transform>
}

/// do ##class(Utils.DTL).Test()
ClassMethod Test()
{
	set source = ##class(Ens.Request).%New()
	#dim target As Utils.Message
	set sc = ..Transform(source, .target)
	do target.XMLExportToString(.xml)
	w xml, !
}

}

Results in:

>do ##class(Utils.DTL).Test()

<ID scope="Message"></ID>

My recommended approach is to call routines in a silent mode if at all possible, or to do minimal modifications to add silent mode. But here's how you can work with read using input redirection:

ClassMethod Test() [ ProcedureBlock = 0 ]
{
    set tOldIORedirected = ##class(%Device).ReDirectIO()
    set tOldMnemonic = ##class(%Device).GetMnemonicRoutine()
    set tOldIO = $io
    try {
        set str=""
        //Redirect IO to the current routine - makes use of the labels defined below
        use $io::("^"_$ZNAME)

        //Enable redirection
        do ##class(%Device).ReDirectIO(1)

        set x = ..MyLegacyRoutine()
    } catch ex {
        do ex.Log()
    }

    //Return to original redirection/mnemonic routine settings
    if (tOldMnemonic '= "") {
        use tOldIO::("^"_tOldMnemonic)
    } else {
        use tOldIO
    }
    do ##class(%Device).ReDirectIO(tOldIORedirected)
    
    w !,"x is: ",x,!
    w "Routine wrote to device: ", str

    //Labels that allow for IO redirection
    //Read Character
rchr(time)  quit "a"
    //Read a string
rstr(len,time) quit "xyz"
    //Write a character - call the output label
wchr(s)      do output($char(s))  quit
    //Write a form feed - call the output label
wff()        do output($char(12))  quit
    //Write a newline - call the output label
wnl()        do output($char(13,10))  quit
    //Write a string - call the output label
wstr(s)      do output(s)  quit
    //Write a tab - call the output label
wtab(s)      do output($char(9))  quit
    //Output label - this is where you would handle routine device output.
    //in our case, we want to write to str
output(s)    set str=str_s   quit
}

ClassMethod MyLegacyRoutine()
{
    read "Input x: ",x
    write "Hello!"
    return x
}

}

 It outputs:

x is: xyz
Routine wrote to device: Input x: Hello!

The easiest way would be to run on the first day of a month and send results for a previous month.

Another way you can do it is to create a schedule which runs 9:00 am to 9:30 am every day (or 28-31) and checks if this is a last day of a month before doing anything.

Schedule is limited to Max String length, so you can also generate a very long schedule once. For example this code would produce a schedule for the next 10 years:

/// date - start date. Must be the last day of the month.
/// months - how many months to generate
ClassMethod Test(date = "2024-09-30", months = 120)
{
	while $i(months,-1)>=0 {
		set year = $system.SQL.DATEPART("year", date)
		set month = $tr($j($system.SQL.DATEPART("month", date), 2), " ", 0)
		set day = $system.SQL.DATEPART("day", date)
		write $$$FormatText("START:%1-%2-%3T09:00:00,STOP:%1-%2-%3T09:30:00,", year, month, day)
		set date = $system.SQL.DATEADD("day", -1, $system.SQL.DATEADD("month", 1, $system.SQL.DATEADD("day", 1, date)))
	}
}
 
Schedule

If you're okay with February 28th for leap years a schedule can be simplified to 12 entries with * in the year.

If all of the above is not an option create a separate Business Service which runs on a first day of a month, calculates last day of a month and sets a correct schedule for BO.

While I agree that ideally you'd run two IRIS nodes in two geographically close but fully separate datacenters, running IRIS in a mirror with both servers in the same datacenter still provides protection from:

  • Server hardware failure
  • OS-level failure
  • IRIS failure

In addition to that datacenters often allow users to specify placement strategy. Select spread placement strategy to avoid hosting both servers on the same underlying hardware if possible.

So mirroring in this scenario still provides a lot of advantages.