Thanks for sharing this @Richard Burrell . So helpful and relevant ones!

liteLLM sounds like a perfect need for a studio concept like this, which could help user explore possibilities from various different vendors. And it's nice they have a hosted UI for configuration too. That was actually an limitation for me while trying to scale up for more models, having a clear distinction of available Vendors, Models along with it's configuration wasn't easy to put through on a lean UI. OpenWebUI looks interesting too, but it would be more on the retrieval side alone right?

Thank you, @Guillaume Rongier 

This sounds interesting. Previously, I explored a few interoperability adapters for a different use case. But this example of performing vector operations through a lighter model seems exciting. I did go for llama-index for its connectors mainly, but I believe going through the interoperability route would be leaner, especially for some retrieval use cases, that I could think in terms of no. of operations.

I would definitely love to learn more, and this has sparked my excitement about having this capability in the playground. Let me look into it further!

Thanks for your response, Zacchaeus! Wish your team all the best.