Hi Norman,

we need to seperate 2 areas of fragmentation.
1. filesystem/OS level fragmentation
     nothing that we can do anything about it except running your trusted defrag if the filesystem has one and actually is in need of defragging.
2. database/global fragmentation:
     This is a very interesting topic, usually nothing needs to be done for an IRIS database, IRIS is pretty good in managing global block density. (refer to https://docs.intersystems.com/irislatest/csp/docbook/DocBook.UI.Page.cls...)

You can use the output of an integrity check to see how your global density is per global in the database. Both defrag and compact operations are non-destructive and non interruptive, so even if they don't finish they can just be started again and will continue on.

Hi Scott,

Check mirror monitor if all databases are caught up on the backup. Or is there one database that is stuck on dejournaling because of that journal file?

Usually happens if the the backup is out of sync for a long time and the file got corrupted/deleted and is no longer available on the Primary or other mirror members.

Two option that i know of here is to 1. restore that file from backup and supply it in the folder that BACKUP complains about. Or rebuild the backup from your primary.

Hi,
Couple of things to check.

Is there any difference in Server design? .e.g. number of disks, scsi controllers, volume/storage distribution etc
Is the VM definition the same? e.g. storage driver versions (generic scsi controller vs hyperV SCSI controller)
Is the OS on the host and in HyperV the same? 
Is the storage provider design the same? 
Is the IRIS config the same (i.e. cpf file), especially are below settings present?

[config]
wduseasyncio=1
asyncwij=8

I guess both IRIS versions are the exactly the same build although i never heard that to affect disk performance.

Here is the implementation:
 

ClassMethod MaxCoverage(ByRef SourceLists, Output Solution as %List) {
    /*
    1. run through each sourcelist and generate a value - list index
     e.g. List(3) would result in a index ^||idx(5,3)="" ^||idx(8,3)="" ^||idx(9,3)=""
     also add the list to a still valid list
    2. iterate over the index find the first value with only one entry and add that list to result list, then run through the list and remove all value index entries for values contained in the list. remove the list from the still valid list.
    3. if no value only has just one list entry, pick the list with the most entries that is on the still valid list. iterate over the list and check each value against the value index, if the value is still in the index remove the value index and add list to the result list. remove the list from the still available list
    4. iterate above until either value index has no more entries, or the still valid list has no more entries.
    5. result list contains all lists required for maximum coverage
    */
    kill Solution
    kill ^||lengthIdx
    kill ^||idx
    kill ^||covered
    set idx=""
    for {
        set idx=$order(SourceLists(idx))
        quit:idx=""
        set listid=0
        set stillAvailable(idx)=""
        set ^||lengthIdx($listlength(SourceLists(idx)),idx)=idx
        while $listnext(SourceLists(idx),listid,listval) {
            set ^||idx(listval,idx)=""
        }
    }


    set listid=""
    // for loop - exit when either ^||idx has no more entries or the still valid list has no more entries
    for {
        if $data(stillAvailable)=0 {
            // no more lists to process
            quit
        }
        if $data(^||idx)=0 {
            // no more values to process
            quit
        }
        // find the first value with only one entry
        set val=""
        set found=0
        for {
            quit:found=1
            set val=$order(^||idx(val))
            quit:val=""
            set listid=""
            for {
                set listid=$order(^||idx(val,listid))
                quit:listid=""
                // found a value check now if ther eis more than one entry
                if $order(^||idx(val,listid))="" {
                    // found a value with only one entry
                    set found=1
                    quit
                }
            }
        }

        if found=0 {
            // haven't found one yet so use the one with the most entries ^||lengthIdx(
            set res=$query(^||lengthIdx(""),-1,val)
            if res'="" {
                set listid=val
            } else {
                // no more entries
                // should never hit this
                quit
            }
        }

        if listid'="" {
            // got a list now process it
            // first remove the list from the available lists
            kill stillAvailable(listid)
            kill ^||lengthIdx($listlength(SourceLists(listid)),listid)
            // iterate trhough the list, check value against the value index
            set listval=0
            w !,"found listid:"_listid,!

            set ptr=0
            set added=0
            while $listnext(SourceLists(listid),ptr,listval) {
                // check if the value is still in the index
                w !,"   checking value:"_listval
                If $INCREMENT(^||covered(listval))
                if $data(^||idx(listval)) {
                    w " - found it!"
                    // remove the value from the index
                    kill ^||idx(listval)
                    // add the list to the result list
                    if added=0 {
                        set Solution=$select($get(Solution)="":$listbuild(listid),1:Solution_$listbuild(listid))
                        set added=1
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

And the execution result:

DEV>set List(1)=$lb(3,5,6,7,9),List(2)=$lb(1,2,6,9),List(3)=$lb(5,8,9),List(4)=$lb(2,4,6,8),List(5)=$lb(4,7,9)

DEV>d ##class(Custom.codegolf).MaxCoverage(.List,.res)
found listid:2

   checking value:1 - found it!
   checking value:2 - found it!
   checking value:6 - found it!
   checking value:9 - found it!
found listid:1

   checking value:3 - found it!
   checking value:5 - found it!
   checking value:6
   checking value:7 - found it!
   checking value:9
found listid:5

   checking value:4 - found it!
   checking value:7
   checking value:9
found listid:4

   checking value:2
   checking value:4
   checking value:6
   checking value:8 - found it!

DEV>zw res
res=$lb("2","1","5","4")

DEV>zw ^||lengthIdx
^||lengthIdx(3,3)=3

DEV>zw ^||covered
^||covered(1)=1
^||covered(2)=2
^||covered(3)=1
^||covered(4)=2
^||covered(5)=1
^||covered(6)=3
^||covered(7)=2
^||covered(8)=1
^||covered(9)=3

my approach would be:

1. run through each list and generate a value - list index
     e.g. List(3) would result in a index ^||idx(5,3)="" ^||idx(8,3)="" ^||idx(9,3)=""
     also add the list to a still valid list
2. iterate over the index find the first value with only one entry and add that list to result list, then run through the list and remove all value index entries for values contained in the list. remove the list from the still valid list.
3. if no value only has just one list entry, pick the list with the most entries that is on the still valid list. iterate over the list and check each value against the value index, if the value is still in the index remove the value index and add list to the result list. remove the list from the still available list
4. iterate above until either value index has no more entries, or the still valid list has no more entries.
5. result list contains all lists required for maximum coverage
Hope that makes sense.

You might want to look into Work queue Manager. It can be configured to use multiple agents to process anything in a queue. This approach is best if the queue is fixed at the start and during the run of the processing, i.e. no items added to be processed.

If you are more for a spooling type setup. You can use Integrations to monitor a spool global and start jobs based on poolsize etc.


ref: Using the Work Queue Manager | Using the Work Queue Manager | InterSystems IRIS Data Platform 2025.1
 

Hi Jude, better option to get help is to open an iService ticket to get specialist help here.

Just a high level:

1. make sure that the parameter you want to use are added via the URL expression on the mun item used to call the report  

2. then the parameter can used in the report manager definition and assigned

Also make sure the parameter id in the format expected. IRIS dates are usually in $Horolog format and not in yyyy-mm-dd as might be expected by LogiReports.