Ok, thanks for that explanation. I knew my solution might not address the question; however I was thinking the may be a solution utilizing the Rules Editor making this much less complex? What about using Contains " [ " instead of " = " and not explicit reference to iterations?
i.e. If(HL7.{PID:PatientIdentifierList().IDNumber} [ HL7.{MRG:PriorPatientIdentifierList().IDNumber},1,o)
Again, I haven't tested, but it saves ( compiles ? ) without error. Not sure if empty parenthesis would work here, or if there is another way to indicate all iterations, and then perhaps the first one could be more explicit (1) ... just thought I would take a stab at this and see if it would be feasible...
- Log in to post comments
