Article
· Nov 28, 2022 2m read

Reviews on Open Exchange - #21

If one of your packages on OEX receives a review you get notified by OEX only own YOUR package.   
The rating reflects the experience of the reviewer with the status found at the time of review.   
It is kind of a snapshot and might have changed meanwhile.   
Reviews by other members of the community are marked by * in the last column.

I also placed a bunch of Pull Requests on Github when I found a problem I could fix.    
Some were accepted and merged, and some were just ignored.     
So if you did a major change and expect a changed review just let me know.

 

# Package Review Stars IPM *
1 iris-fhir-app an excellent 6* example 6.0 y  
2 FHIR Questionnaires an excellent 5.5* experience 5.5 y  
3 intersystems-iris-dev-template 5.5* top quality 5.5    
4 Dataset-Lightweight-M-N deep look inside 5.0 y *
5 EXCEL as a REST application unexpected surprise 5.0    
6 FirstLook-Globals starter for beginners 5.0    
7 GitHubAPI different way to GitHub 5.0 y  
8 GlobalToJSON-Academic academic not for practice 5.0 y *
9 helper-for-objectscript-language-extensions funny COS extension 5.0 y *
10 IRIS-Docker-micro-Durability so easy no dirty tricks 5.0   *
11 ssl-client fastest SSL setup 5.0 y  
12 SUDOKU-es ¡ muchas gracias ! 5.0 y *
13 zpm-dockerhub understand ZPM installation 5.0    
14 Contest-FHIR real ePy exercise 4.5    
15 M-commands instead of Excel formulas in cells external scripting 4.5    
16 SEA BATTLE on EXCEL really funny 4.5    
17 SPOOL-demo-ZPM SPOOL is still alive 4.5 y *
18 dynapool an interesting extension 4.0    
19 fhir-healthy-pregnancy disappointing 3.5    
20 iris-on-fhir works partially 3.5 y  
21 Pregnancy Symptoms Tracker not convincing 3.5 y  
22 WebSocketClient CSP based not for docker - use ZPM 2.5 y *
Discussion (0)1
Log in or sign up to continue