0
259

Written by

Robert Cemper
~~ retired but not tired ~~
MOD
Follow
Article Robert Cemper · Sep 8, 2023 2m read

Reviews on Open Exchange - #31

#Open Exchange

If one of your packages on OEX receives a review you get notified by OEX only of YOUR own package.   
The rating reflects the experience of the reviewer with the status found at the time of review.   
It is kind of a snapshot and might have changed meanwhile.   
Reviews by other members of the community are marked by * in the last column.

I also placed a bunch of Pull Requests on GitHub when I found a problem I could fix.    
Some were accepted and merged, and some were just ignored.     
So if you made a major change and expect a changed review just let me know.
<--break->

# Package Review Stars IPM *
1 QuinielaML get rich by ML prediction 5.5    
2 fastapi-iris-demo perfect demo 5.0    
3 IntegrityLog-Web Very clean way to represent and explore integrity reports. 5.0 y *
4 IRIS Hibernate Dialect The most famous ORM now available in version 6 with IRIS 5.0   *
5 IRIS-FlaskBlog Excellent demonstration of the use of SQLAlchemy in IRIS 5.0   *
6 todo-list nice and useful example 5.0 y  
7 workshop-dicom-orthanc well prepared demo 5.0    
8 workshop-integratedml-csv a great ML demo 5.0    
9 iOS HealthKit to FHIR through IRIS for Health Very practical application to simply demonstrate how to upload IoT data to an IRIS FH 5.0   *
10 iris-healthtoolkit-service Beautiful demo of several conversions of common healthcare standards. 5.0   *
11 irisChatGPT Good idea to use ChatGPT with IRIS and FHIR data 4.0 y *
12 System-Task-REST good idea for a demo 4.0 y  
13 fhir-scraper Nice Python sample to transform and transfer all resources between 2 FHIR servers 4.0   *
14 CSPFileViewDownload nice tool 3.5    
15 dbt-iris What's the message ? 3.5    
Related posts
Show all
Discussion (4)3
Log in or sign up to continue

Comments

Robert Cemper · Sep 9, 2023

Today I had to process a rather sad exercise. 😢

For about 15 recognized packages in OEX I had to cancel my previous reviews
because the packages were broken. 
They could have been fixéd easily as there were PRs ready.
But for more than 3 months these fixes were just ignored by their owners.
On top of it:
A significant part of them was highly awarded in previous contests

I'm deeply disappointed, as the Quality of Packages in OEX was a personal focus.
However, I have to accept that quality has lost importance also in this
narrow section of my life.

😞

0
Evgeny Shvarov  Sep 11, 2023 to Robert Cemper

Hi Robert!

The quality of Open Exchange is very important, of course! And we have a set of features and processes are intended to understand and improve the average quality of projects. And as OEX is a living mechanism it is not possible to "click" and improve the quality forever.

I appreciate your willingness to improve the quality and PRs submission. Please suggest what do you think could be introduced more to improve the quality. 
We'll try to make PRs more visible in Open Exchange.

And also the ideas on how to improve the quality of the submissions are very welcome! 

0
Ashok Kumar T · Sep 10, 2023

Thank you @Robert Cemper  for spending time on the evaluation on the IntegrityLog-Web ,  CSPFileViewDownload and System-Task-REST and provided valuable feedback. 

0