While you are in  terminal  $IO="|TRM|:|10468" or similar

from Studio it is  "|TCP|1972|11096"   with  1972 as Superserver port

It's one of the differences

I fully support your proposal.
I published >700 reviews for the actual 1156 visible packages.
And there are several challenges to be addressed with any new structure.

• The reviews with stars focus on an actual individual snapshot.
• Similar to the code or example, they age and may become invalid.
• Ongoing maintenance by creators can't be expected
• So a clear separation between actual and maintained packages and those just kept for historical reference could be useful.
• The decision for maintenance must be left to the creator
  • Example:
  • If some essential function in IRIS is dropped without replacement
  • with no acceptable workaround, I'd move it to the archive
  • I just had to unpublish some packages for this reason 
• Another category could be packages where ISC takes responsibility.

This isn't a solution, but a step in between to improve the actual situation
I wonder how many of the 1156 packages might move to the archive without maintenance

There is no voting on the numbers added

Chrome could be a beast on caching
For other cases, I had to clear  its cache from settings several times
The latest AI stuff even modified my text during typing.
I had to fight to lock it in chains