Article
· Apr 3 2m read

Reviews on Open Exchange - #41

If one of your packages on OEX receives a review you get notified by OEX only of YOUR own package.   
The rating reflects the experience of the reviewer with the status found at the time of review.   
It is kind of a snapshot and might have changed meanwhile.   
Reviews by other members of the community are marked by * in the last column.

I also placed a bunch of Pull Requests on GitHub when I found a problem I could fix.    
Some were accepted and merged, and some were just ignored.     
So if you made a major change and expect a changed review just let me know.

# Package Review Stars IPM Docker *
1 iris-xml-sample just perfect 5.5* 5.5   y  
2 fhirserver-profile-based-validation A valuable help to save time on the operation of FHIR profile validation. 5.0     *
3 Jupyter Server Proxy for VS Code Great utility 5.0   y *
4 OwnObjectScriptExtension Works 5.0     *
5 Vector-inside-IRIS all in COS 5.0 y y *
6 webHERALD Simplifying Mobile Integration for Caché Developers 5.0     *
7 workshop-smart A valuable help to save time on the operation of FHIR profile validation. 5.0   y *
8 UnitTest_RuleSet Great working example - easy to adapt 5.0     *
9 workshop-vector-face funny example on vectors 4.8   y  
10 yaml-utils Excellent yaml to json converter. 4.6 y   *

 

A Bit of History & Statistics

  • I started this series 3 years ago with April 2021 reviews
  • 913 packages of OEX were checked over this time
  • 708 (77.3 %) had a review worth to be listed
  • 576 (81.4 %) of them were done by myself
  • 134 (18.6 %) were contributed by other members of the community (BIG THANKS)

A technical note

All data were collected by analysis of official published web pages of OEX and GitHub.
So there may be some numeric differences as I never adjusted historical data.

Discussion (0)1
Log in or sign up to continue