InterSystems IRIS has long supported the obvious translation functions required to for converting to upper or lowercase to enforce case-insensitive string comparison (e.g. in ObjectScript with $zconvert) and sorting (e.g. with SQL collation functions, not to be confused with NLS collation). Customers in international contexts have at times used custom workarounds to also treat accent insensitivity or even more advanced normalization duct tape. We’re looking to address such use cases at the system and SQL level to increase convenience for this international audience, which is well represented on the Developer Community.
I have a quick SQL question. I am working with a class, which has a calculated property, which in turned indexed. The calculation for this property is created based on another property value via: SqlComputeOnChange = attributes - so basically every time I add a property attribute to my class, my new property is calculated based on some SqlComputeCode which calls some class method.
Hi, I have a timestamp of 201906192359 with a HL7 and I need to add a minute to it to get 201906200000. Is there an easy way within Healthshare to do this?
It seems easy enough within SQL but I cannot get the SQL to work within Healthshare, this is what I have for SQL which does the job in SQL Server.
I need to know what permissions or resources, apart from read for the tables, a user would need to view the catalog via ODBC? The ODBC user can run queries sucessfully but cannot get the catalog from the DB via ODBC. Whereas a a user with %All can fetch the catalog.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/Gx6-_fLrsjw [This is an embedded link, but you cannot view embedded content directly on the site because you have declined the cookies necessary to access it. To view embedded content, you would need to accept all cookies in your Cookies Settings]
InterSystems is pleased to announce the General Availability of InterSystems IRIS Cloud SQL and InterSystems IRIS Cloud IntegratedML, two foundational services for developing cloud-native solutions powered by the proven, enterprise-class performance and reliability of InterSystems IRIS technology.
I have a ZEN page with nine tablepanes. Each tablepane queries a table in the same SQLServer db. I have a single SQLGateWay(odbc) to this SQLServer db. I need to get better performance when I query all nine table at the same time. Would my performance improve if I had nine SQLGateWays(nine odbc configurations/connections), one for each query? I would appreciate any and all suggestions for getting the very best performance when using SQLGateWays. Thank you.
I have a code written in cache sql and trying to understand it, below is the code , can anyone help me understand what does that mean
ex - !! dosage_unit !!
SELECT (CASE WHEN (order_description IS NULL OR (order_description='')) THEN '' ELSE (order_description) END) !! (CASE WHEN (dosage IS NULL OR dosage_unit IS NULL OR (dosage='') OR (dosage_unit='')) THEN '' ELSE (', ' !! dosage !! ' ' !! dosage_unit !!
On an IRIS system, we expect the default string collation for SQL columns to be SQLUPPER. This means WHERE conditions will be case-insensitive. However, when I make a WHERE condition on a SQL procedure that returns a string, it's case sensitive.For example:
In order to prioritize functional requirements for evolving our SQL developer experience, we have prepared a short survey to better understand how you’re currently using and, in an ideal world, would like most to interact with our SQL platform.
A question has come up that I am not finding the answer for.... Does the daily purge process re-index EnsLib.HL7.SearchTable or other SQL tables? In looking at the purge process documentation I am not seeing anything that mentions EnsLib.HL7.SearchTable. Do we have to manually constantly re-index tables that we create? For example I created another search table based off of EnsLib.HL7.Search table, will I need to constantly watch this as it grows? How do tables get index, is there some kind of mechanism that automatically does it, or are we responsible for indexing tables ourselves?
How strange this is to me. I'm querying a table against a numeric(15,2) column call max_client_resp_service. When I query max_client_resp_service > 0 or any number, I get results, but they are not always right, for example where max_client_resp_service > 5 returns values less than 5, e.g.
Hi, we are a veterinary lab and we use both the LAB and FIN systems of Antrim. Now we are looking to expose the data in a SQL/Object compatible way so we were wondering if same / similar things had been done by other community members already? If so, could you please share your approach / experience / gotchas with us and we are all ears. I can be reached at yang.jiao@antechmail.com . Thank you!
Customizing Stored Procedures with ObjectScript directly has been useful to access NoSQL storage and external messaging via integration, to present output in tabular format.
In the Inbound SQL Adapter settings, is it possible to specify more than 1 field as the Key Field Name?
Because of the way the Query is being index in Ensemble by the Key Field Name, sometimes transactions get missed and I would like to see if we can add an additional key to the mix to ensure all the transactions are picked up. In this case the InterfaceTrigger is an ID that is auto generated by the table, and I would like to use that as well to ensure we don't miss transactions, and it does not throw any warning messages when it executes the Delete Query.
Suppose you have an application that allows users to write posts and comment on them. (Wait... that sounds familiar...)
For a given user, you want to be able to list all of the published posts with which that user has interacted - that is, either authored or commented on. How do you make this as fast as possible?
Here's what our %Persistent class definitions might look like as a starting point (storage definitions are important, but omitted for brevity):
The index we want to use is called "iFilter". Currently we use the following technique of ignoring all other indices because the automatically chosen index is always too slow.
In Cache 2018, we were using a macro in a query that looked like this:
select $$GetExtraSQL^GetExtra('B',bddtl.odnumb,bddtl.odsnum,bddtl.oddsc1) as "Description", * from sqluser.bddtl
We could save that query as a view, and there was no problem with it.
In IRIS, if we put that query into SQL in the management portal, it still works, but if we save that query as a view, when we try to run a query on that view, we get a big error message:
SELECT '['||Material->Sifra||'] '||Material->Opis AS Material, SUM(MasaBlago) AS MasaBlago FROM Tehtanje.Dokument WHERE DatumDokumenta BETWEEN '01/01/2023' AND '04/01/2023' AND (Material->Sifra %INLIST $LISTFROMSTRING('5,7',',')) GROUP BY Material ORDER BY %EXACT Material
The query returns all rows where Material->Sifra is 5 or 7. That's OK.
If I want to get all rows where Material->Sifra is NOT 5 or 7 I use query:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/i6AkBtB3F-M [This is an embedded link, but you cannot view embedded content directly on the site because you have declined the cookies necessary to access it. To view embedded content, you would need to accept all cookies in your Cookies Settings]
Can anyone please help me how to use regular expression/wild character on a sql query for a pattern like C00.0 to C00.9, C01.0 to C01.9 and so on until C77.0 to C77.9 .
We need a web-based SQL tool to connect to Ensemble/Cache, that will offer more functionality than what the Management Portal offers. It needs to be web based, so that we can host it on a machine that has connectivity to the server via the superserver port. We (the devs and support) only have browser access to the environment via Remote Desktops, hence the requirement.
Has anyone gotten OmniDB to connect to Ensemble/Cache? If so, can you please advise on how to configure it?
Any other suggestions for such a tool are also welcome.
By views
.png)